+0

# (2x+1)(3xsquared-2x-5)

0
187
19

(2x+1)(3xsquared-2x-5)

Guest Feb 11, 2015

### Best Answer

#1
+1090
+10

When typing, use this notation for power "^2"

So we have:

(2x + 1)(3x^2 - 2x - 5)

Let's use the box method of multiplication for explanation:

3x^2    -2x      -5

2x | 6x^3 | -4x^2 | -10x

1   | 3x^2 | -2x     | -5

Since we've multiplied all of the terms using a box, now we can add them all together:

6x^3 + 3x^2 - 4x^2 -2x - 10x - 5

After combining like terms, we have: 6x^3 - x^2 -12x -5

Mathematician  Feb 11, 2015
Sort:

### 19+0 Answers

#1
+1090
+10
Best Answer

When typing, use this notation for power "^2"

So we have:

(2x + 1)(3x^2 - 2x - 5)

Let's use the box method of multiplication for explanation:

3x^2    -2x      -5

2x | 6x^3 | -4x^2 | -10x

1   | 3x^2 | -2x     | -5

Since we've multiplied all of the terms using a box, now we can add them all together:

6x^3 + 3x^2 - 4x^2 -2x - 10x - 5

After combining like terms, we have: 6x^3 - x^2 -12x -5

Mathematician  Feb 11, 2015
#2
+80922
0

Thanks, Mathematician....I like that method !!!

CPhill  Feb 11, 2015
#3
+1090
+3

Yep, it's the first method my school taught me (just recently), but using distribution is less time consuming.

Mathematician  Feb 11, 2015
#4
+80922
+3

I dunno'...this method seems pretty "clean'.....you can follow the "diagonal" pattern to combine like terms......!!!

CPhill  Feb 11, 2015
#5
+1090
+3

It is definitely very accurate because of its display; however by "going down the line" in distribution, one can combine like terms in the same way.

It is a good method for teaching, but in practice, I use distribution.

Mathematician  Feb 11, 2015
#6
+18
0

i like the method. it seems kind of easier lol..

HappyBJ  Feb 11, 2015
#7
+80922
0

Yep...me, too.....HappyBJ.....!!!

CPhill  Feb 11, 2015
#8
+18
0

u mean BJ? LOL

HappyBJ  Feb 11, 2015
#9
+1090
0

I guess it's sort of a number sense mentality to want to problems faster rather than with accuracy and ease...

Academic U.I.L. is fine ingrained within my mind now.

Mathematician  Feb 11, 2015
#10
+3682
0

here i am again!

BrittanyJ  Feb 11, 2015
#11
+80922
0

I can't call you BJ....that one is "reserved" for BrittanyJ.....!!!!

I might use HBJ.....how does that sound???

CPhill  Feb 11, 2015
#12
+3682
0

hey, Mathematician! wat about "M&M" for nickname? LMAO!

BrittanyJ  Feb 11, 2015
#13
+3682
+3

ummm hello???? CPhill??? (ill let u think about this "BJ-nickname" situation.. lol

BrittanyJ  Feb 11, 2015
#14
+80922
+3

Hey, Mathematician..you should feel honored..BJ just gave you your "forum name'...that OFFICIALLY accepts you into the "pack'  !!!

## MatheMatician  =  M & M   !!!!

CPhill  Feb 11, 2015
#15
+3682
0

Chris, have u figured out who HappyBJ is?

BrittanyJ  Feb 11, 2015
#16
+1090
0

That was nice... I think I'll accept that name (or that name will be accepted upon me for me.)

Mathematician  Feb 11, 2015
#17
+80922
+3

No clue.....maybe he's related to LBJ....!!!!

CPhill  Feb 11, 2015
#18
+3682
+3

same person, chris... same person LOL

BrittanyJ  Feb 11, 2015
#19
+91436
0

I have not seen mathematician's method before either but I do like it!!

Melody  Feb 11, 2015

### 17 Online Users

We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.  See details