+0

# 3^x=x^5

0
343
4

3^x=x^5 what numbers make this true please give answers to the 2nd decimal

Guest May 2, 2015

#1
+80941
+10

3^x  = x ^5       take the log of both sides

log 3^x   = logx^5     and we can write

x log3  = 5 log x

Rearrange

x / log x  = 5/log 3

Mmmm....that doesn't look too promising, does it???

Let's just graph the original functions and see where they meet (if they do....!!)

Here's a partial graph......https://www.desmos.com/calculator/roelalpkth

The graph shows that one solution occurs at about (1.343, 4.375)

Another solution occurs at about (10.351, 150,462).....shown here....https://www.desmos.com/calculator/ujgxybuyeq

This happens because from x values (-∞, 1.343), the graph of 3^x > x^5. Then  from (1.343, 10.351), the graph of x^5 > 3^x.  Finally, the graph of 3^x "overtakes" the graph of x^5 at about x = 10.351, and is always greater at any comparavle x value after that - as we would expect....!!!!

CPhill  May 2, 2015
Sort:

#1
+80941
+10

3^x  = x ^5       take the log of both sides

log 3^x   = logx^5     and we can write

x log3  = 5 log x

Rearrange

x / log x  = 5/log 3

Mmmm....that doesn't look too promising, does it???

Let's just graph the original functions and see where they meet (if they do....!!)

Here's a partial graph......https://www.desmos.com/calculator/roelalpkth

The graph shows that one solution occurs at about (1.343, 4.375)

Another solution occurs at about (10.351, 150,462).....shown here....https://www.desmos.com/calculator/ujgxybuyeq

This happens because from x values (-∞, 1.343), the graph of 3^x > x^5. Then  from (1.343, 10.351), the graph of x^5 > 3^x.  Finally, the graph of 3^x "overtakes" the graph of x^5 at about x = 10.351, and is always greater at any comparavle x value after that - as we would expect....!!!!

CPhill  May 2, 2015
#2
+91435
0

I do not know how to do this any other way either Chris :)

Melody  May 3, 2015
#3
+26399
+5

Here's a numerical approach using Newton-Raphson:

(These basically agree with Chris's solutions, though I think he misprinted 10.851 as 10.351.)

To two decimal places these are  1.34 and 10.85

.

Alan  May 3, 2015
#4
+80941
0

LOL!!!.....I didn't misprint anything......I just can't see........!!!!

10.851 is correct......

CPhill  May 3, 2015

### 26 Online Users

We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.  See details