+0  
 
0
697
6
avatar+1832 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Nov 22, 2014

Best Answer 

 #5
avatar+118608 
+10

In the first on I just got rid of the sqrtx in the denominator of the numerator.

And in the last one I expanded the bottom and collected the y^2 terms.

That is all.  :)

 Nov 22, 2014
 #1
avatar+128407 
+10

The first one looks good.....I'll look at the others as I get to them......

The second is OK, too.....

Yeah.....the last one is OK, too.......a lot of "messy" Algebra in that one, huh???

 

 Nov 22, 2014
 #2
avatar+118608 
+10

Yes, i think the first 2 look good but the second one i simplified a little further.

I haven't done the third one yet.

 Nov 22, 2014
 #3
avatar+118608 
+10

Again, my  answer is the same as yours for the third one but I would have gone one more step :)

 Nov 22, 2014
 #4
avatar+1832 
+5

Thank you Chris and Melody 

 

Melody Can you show me your simplification ? 

 Nov 22, 2014
 #5
avatar+118608 
+10
Best Answer

In the first on I just got rid of the sqrtx in the denominator of the numerator.

And in the last one I expanded the bottom and collected the y^2 terms.

That is all.  :)

Melody Nov 22, 2014
 #6
avatar+1832 
+5

Nice , thank you 

 Nov 22, 2014

2 Online Users

avatar