+0

0
278
10

Guest Jan 9, 2015

#9
+26397
+5

The "cubic" part of the inverse function is defined for y less than 0 not y greater than 3 -  see http://web2.0calc.com/questions/math-problem_17#r4

Look at the graph of the original function.  It is defined for all x and all y, and has a one-to-one mapping x onto y and a one-to-one mapping y onto x, so the inverse function does also.

.

You have interpreted the inverse function by just interchanging x and y.  I've interpreted it as as a mapping back from the original f(x) onto the original x, which means, for me, the "x" in f-1(x) is on the original "y" axis, and f-1(x) is on the original "x" axis.

.

Is this confusing or what?!!!!!

.

Alan  Jan 11, 2015
Sort:

#1
+91412
+5

I think that this question was answered in the last couple of days already. (By someone else)

BUT

y=3-x  This is a line with gradiene = -1 so when it is reflected across y=x it stays the same

So its inverse is y=3-x

$$f(0)=3\qquad so \qquad f^{-1}(0)=3$$

$$\\y=-x^3+2x^2+3x\\ inverse\;\; function\\ x=-y^3+2y^2+3y\\ when\;\; x=6\\ 6=-y^3+2y^2+3y\\ 0=-y^3+2y^2+3y-6\\ 0=-y^2(y-2)+3(y-2)\\ 0=(-y^2+3)(y-2)\\ 3-y^2=0\qquad or \qquad y-2=0\\ y^2=3\qquad \qquad or \qquad y=2\\ y=\pm\sqrt{3}\qquad \qquad or \qquad y=2\\ y=\pm1.732 \qquad \qquad or \qquad y=2\\ but\;\; y>3 \\ So no solutions to  f^{-1}(6)$$

NO SOLUTION.

I have replace the graph the original one had the wrong coefficients and caused me great confusion.

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/alqdacy7uh

Melody  Jan 10, 2015
#2
+80815
+5

Melody...I don't think it's going to be very easy to "manually" isolate  "x" in the function -x^3 -2x^2 + 3x so that an inverse an be found  ..!!!!

Here's what WolfamAlpha generated as the inverse.....it looks pretty  "nasty".... (to say the least)

I think Alan answered this one.....but he did it graphialy, as I recall....

CPhill  Jan 10, 2015
#3
+91412
+5

I am sticking with my first answer - I think that the algebra is correct

My original graph had the wrong coefficients so it was incorrect ***

This graph is correct and it shows that there are no values for      $$f^{-1}(6)$$

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/d86qhh4t5m

So I still say there are no solutions.    Because  x=6 is not in the domain of the invese function !

What answer did Alan get?

------------------------------

Also  Chris the whole graph is of no consequence because there are restrictions on the range of the inverse fuction,

y>3   therefore    x<0    therefore   $$f^{-1}(6)$$   does not exist.

----------------------------------

Melody  Jan 10, 2015
#4
+80815
+5

I did this the same as you and found....as you did...that whatever values were put into the original function to produce "6" - namely, ±√3 and 2 -  were outside the prescribed domain of the original function...!!!!

Maybe we have "clunker" here ?????

CPhill  Jan 10, 2015
#5
+91412
+5

Yes i am happy with my answer I think.

I have played with the graph some more as well and I am totally happy.

Melody  Jan 10, 2015
#6
+80815
+5

[ I don't see what he did, but I'm pretty sure that you and I are correct....no solution to the second part of the problem as it was presented...!!!]

CPhill  Jan 10, 2015
#7
+26397
0

I think 6 is in the domain of the inverse function.  When f(x) = 6, x = -3, so f-1(6) = -3.  This is on the linear part of the function.

.

Alan  Jan 10, 2015
#8
+91412
+5

Okay Alan can you please spot the fault in my logic?

$$\\y=-x^3+2x^2+3x \qquad for \;\;x>3\\\\ Inverse function\\ x=-y^3+2y^2+3y \qquad for \;\;y>3\\\\ When\;\;x=6$$

I was going to keep going but I have already done it in my first post

When x=6   there are 3 solutions for y but for each y is less than 3 so there are no solutions.

NOW

To confirm this I did a graph.   The blue graph on the top is the inverse graph.

It confirms that there is no  f-1(6)

Which bit of my logic seems wrong to you?

OR is it just that the result disagrees with your logic and you haven't worked out why yet?

I am not trying to put you on the spot but usually you can show me what I have done wrong.

Melody  Jan 11, 2015
#9
+26397
+5

The "cubic" part of the inverse function is defined for y less than 0 not y greater than 3 -  see http://web2.0calc.com/questions/math-problem_17#r4

Look at the graph of the original function.  It is defined for all x and all y, and has a one-to-one mapping x onto y and a one-to-one mapping y onto x, so the inverse function does also.

.

You have interpreted the inverse function by just interchanging x and y.  I've interpreted it as as a mapping back from the original f(x) onto the original x, which means, for me, the "x" in f-1(x) is on the original "y" axis, and f-1(x) is on the original "x" axis.

.

Is this confusing or what?!!!!!

.

Alan  Jan 11, 2015
#10
+91412
0

Yes it is totally confusing!     Thanks Alan,  I will try and work out what you are saying.

Melody  Jan 11, 2015

### 24 Online Users

We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.  See details