+0

# This is for Max!

+1
232
6

Hello Max: Have you seen this problem of a week or so ago: 3log(x - 2) = log(2x) - 3, solve for x.

Can you take a crack at it and see how far you can go? Thanks.

Guest Jun 4, 2017
Sort:

#1
0

Here is a "ridiculous" solution from Mathematica 11, IF anybody cares to go through it. There surely MUST be a shorter solution!!.

Solve for x:
(3 log(x - 2))/(log(10)) = (log(2 x))/(log(10)) - 3

Subtract (log(2 x))/(log(10)) - 3 from both sides:
3 + (3 log(x - 2))/(log(10)) - (log(2 x))/(log(10)) = 0

Bring 3 + (3 log(x - 2))/(log(10)) - (log(2 x))/(log(10)) together using the common denominator log(10):
(3 log(10) + 3 log(x - 2) - log(2 x))/(log(10)) = 0

Multiply both sides by log(10):
3 log(10) + 3 log(x - 2) - log(2 x) = 0

3 log(10) + 3 log(x - 2) - log(2 x) = log(1000) + log((x - 2)^3) + log(1/(2 x)) = log((500 (x - 2)^3)/x):
log((500 (x - 2)^3)/x) = 0

Cancel logarithms by taking exp of both sides:
(500 (x - 2)^3)/x = 1

Multiply both sides by x:
500 (x - 2)^3 = x

Subtract x from both sides:
500 (x - 2)^3 - x = 0

Expand out terms of the left hand side:
500 x^3 - 3000 x^2 + 5999 x - 4000 = 0

Eliminate the quadratic term by substituting y = x - 2:
-4000 + 5999 (y + 2) - 3000 (y + 2)^2 + 500 (y + 2)^3 = 0

Expand out terms of the left hand side:
500 y^3 - y - 2 = 0

Divide both sides by 500:
y^3 - y/500 - 1/250 = 0

Change coordinates by substituting y = z + λ/z, where λ is a constant value that will be determined later:
-1/250 + 1/500 (-z - λ/z) + (z + λ/z)^3 = 0

Multiply both sides by z^3 and collect in terms of z:
z^6 + z^4 (3 λ - 1/500) - (z^3)/(250) + z^2 (3 λ^2 - (λ)/(500)) + λ^3 = 0

Substitute λ = 1/1500 and then u = z^3, yielding a quadratic equation in the variable u:
u^2 - u/250 + 1/3375000000 = 0

Find the positive solution to the quadratic equation:
u = (450 + sqrt(202485))/225000

Substitute back for u = z^3:
z^3 = (450 + sqrt(202485))/225000

Taking cube roots gives (450 + sqrt(202485))^(1/3)/(10 15^(2/3)) times the third roots of unity:
z = (450 + sqrt(202485))^(1/3)/(10 15^(2/3)) or z = -(-450 - sqrt(202485))^(1/3)/(10 15^(2/3)) or z = ((-1)^(2/3) (450 + sqrt(202485))^(1/3))/(10 15^(2/3))

Substitute each value of z into y = z + 1/(1500 z):
y = (sqrt(202485) + 450)^(1/3)/(10 15^(2/3)) + 1/(10 (15 (sqrt(202485) + 450))^(1/3)) or y = (-1)^(2/3)/(10 (15 (sqrt(202485) + 450))^(1/3)) - (-sqrt(202485) - 450)^(1/3)/(10 15^(2/3)) or y = ((-1)^(2/3) (sqrt(202485) + 450)^(1/3))/(10 15^(2/3)) - 1/10 ((-1)/(15 (sqrt(202485) + 450)))^(1/3)

Bring each solution to a common denominator and simplify:
y = ((sqrt(202485) + 450)^(2/3) + 15^(1/3))/(10 15^(2/3) (450 + sqrt(202485))^(1/3)) or y = ((-15)^(2/3) - (-15)^(1/3) (sqrt(202485) + 450)^(2/3))/(150 (450 + sqrt(202485))^(1/3)) or y = -((sqrt(202485) - 450)^(1/3) - (-1)^(2/3) (sqrt(202485) + 450)^(1/3))/(10 15^(2/3))

Substitute back for x = y + 2:
x = (15^(1/3) + (sqrt(202485) + 450)^(2/3))/(10 15^(2/3) (sqrt(202485) + 450)^(1/3)) + 2 or x = ((-15)^(2/3) - (-15)^(1/3) (sqrt(202485) + 450)^(2/3))/(150 (sqrt(202485) + 450)^(1/3)) + 2 or x = 2 - ((sqrt(202485) - 450)^(1/3) - (-1)^(2/3) (450 + sqrt(202485))^(1/3))/(10 15^(2/3))

(3 log(x - 2))/(log(10)) ≈ -2.41495 + 2.759 i
(log(2 x))/(log(10)) - 3 ≈ -2.41495 + 0.030247 i:
So this solution is incorrect

(3 log(x - 2))/(log(10)) ≈ -2.36393
(log(2 x))/(log(10)) - 3 ≈ -2.36393:
So this solution is correct

(3 log(x - 2))/(log(10)) ≈ -2.41495 - 2.759 i
(log(2 x))/(log(10)) - 3 ≈ -2.41495 - 0.030247 i:
So this solution is incorrect

The solution is:
Answer: | x = (15^(1/3) + (sqrt(202485) + 450)^(2/3))/(10 15^(2/3) (sqrt(202485) + 450)^(1/3)) + 2 = 2.1629388880535156

Guest Jun 4, 2017
#2
+5931
+1

I don't think there is a shorter  " exact "  solution than that.... because in order to get x all by itself on one side of the equation, you must go through the process of solving a cubic equation.

hectictar  Jun 4, 2017
#3
+1

hectictar: I just programmed the equation into my computer and it came back with the answer as:

x =2.16293888805 in less a second. It used Newton's method to home in on the answer. Perhaps, it is much easier and faster to solve such equations using this Newton's method.

Guest Jun 4, 2017
#6
+91462
0
Melody  Jun 4, 2017

### 2 Online Users

We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.  See details