+2442 Let's think about this problem; I've been begged to attempt to solve this problem, so I guess I will give it a shot:
\(\frac{x}{4000-x}=a^2\)
This represents the problem exactly.
Let's solve for x:
| \(\frac{x}{4000-x}=a^2\) | Multiply by 4000-x on both sides of the equation. |
| \(x=a^2(4000-x)\) | Distribute the a^2 to both terms inside of the parentheses. |
| \(x=4000a^2-a^2x\) | Add a^2*x to both sides of the equation. |
| \(x+a^2x=4000a^2\) | Let's factor out an x from both of the terms on the left hand side of the equation. |
| \(x(1+a^2)=4000a^2\) | Divide by 1+a^2 on both sides of the equation. |
| \(x=\frac{4000a^2}{1+a^2}\) | |
Ok, now let's try and think about this problem logically. \(a^2\) will never be divisible by \(1+a^2\) because adding one to a number means that the numbers are co-prime. Because of this, we do not have to consider any of the cases. The only time there will be integer solutions for x is when 4000 is divisible by \(1+a^2\); in other words, we need to know the factors of 4000.
The factors of 4000, in order, are \({1,2,4,5,8,10,16,20,25,32,40,50,80,100,125,160,200,250,400,500,800,1000,2000,4000}\). Now, we must set the denominator to all these values and solve:
First is 1. Here we go:
| \(1+a^2=1\) | Subtract 1 on both sides of the equation |
| \(a^2=0\) | Take the square root of both sides |
| \(|a|=0\) | Split your answers into plus or minus. |
| \(a=0\) | |
Here's a question, though. Is 0 a perfect square? Unfortunately, I am unsure about whether or not it is indeed a perfect square because definitions vary. Many people agree with the definition of if \(\sqrt{a}\in\mathbb{Z}\)where \({a}\in\mathbb{Z}\) , then that number is a perfect square. With that definition, 0 is a perfect square. However, some define it as \(\sqrt{a}\in\mathbb{N}\) where \({a}\in\mathbb{Z}\). In this case, 0 would be excluded. It's an open question, really, without a concrete answer. If you know whether or not an answer exists to this question, I would appreciate feedback. Anyway, let's try the next factor, 2:
You know what? There is a method to make this go even faster, anyway! Let's take the following set and subtract 1 from every term.
Now,\({1,2,4,5,8,10,16,20,25,32,40,50,80,100,125,160,200,250,400,500,800,1000,2000,4000}\)
transforms into \({0,1,3,4,7,9,15,19,24,31,39,49,79,99,124,159,199,249,399,499,799,999,1999,3999}\). Now, out of those, which ones are perfects squares? They are the following:
\(0,1,4,9,49\)
Now, take the square roots of the numbers in the set:
\(0,1,2,3,7\)
Therefore, the sum of the positive perfect square integers is \(0+1+2+3+7=13\).
+2442 This is a rare example in mathematics where, I believe, parentheses is necessary in order to evaluate the expression without ambiguity. I will demonstrate why.
Strictly speaking, asinus's interpretation is incorrect. If you were to evaluate this with a calculator inputted like as is, the calculator would evaluate it as \(\frac{6^2}{2}*3+4\). This is because the 2(3) is really multiplication, so division takes precedence since it is comes first in the expression. First it does 6^2, then it divides 6^2 by 2 because division is first from left to right, and then it multiplies that quantity by 3. Here is another example with a variable
8/2y
Using the same logic as above, this equation, in fraction form is strictly \(\frac{8}{2}y\)--not \(\frac{8}{2y}\). Some would argue, however, that 2y is a term, so it shouldn't be separated.
How do we eliminate this ambiguity if there is no fraction button to speak of? Use parentheses!
Asinus's interpretation of \(\frac{6^2}{2*3}+4\) will be unambiguous once you add 1 set of parentheses with \(6^2/(2(3))+4\). Now, the only correct interpretation is \(\frac{6^2}{2*3}+4\) because the parentheses indicate that we are dividing by the quantity of the product of 2 and 3.
The strict interpretation is \(\frac{6^2}{2}*3+4\) should be written like \((6^2/2)(3)+4\). In this case, the quantity of six squared divided by two is all multiplied by three. No more ambiguity.
Okay, after all of this ranting, now I will evaluate what I believe to be, under the current rules of the order of operations, the way to evaluate the expression 6^2/2(3)+4 as \(\frac{6^2}{2}*3+4\):
| \(\frac{6^2}{2}*3+4\) | Evaluate the numerator. \(6^2=36\) |
| \(\frac{36}{2}*3+4\) | Simplify the fraction by recognizing that the 36 is divisible by 2 because 36 is even. |
| \(18*3+4\) | Do multiplication before addition. |
| \(54+4\) | |
| \(58\) | |
?!
