+0  
 
+1
117
4
avatar+223 

This is what i have so far.

1. (-oo,-4)U(-2,3)U(4,oo)

2. (-4,-2)U[3,4]

3. (-3,-1)U(0,-2)

4. (-5,-3)U(-1,0)U(3,oo)

5. (-4,-2)U(-1,1)

6. (1,3)

7. (-oo,-5)U(3,4)U[4,oo]

8. (-5)

 

Veteran  Apr 26, 2017
Sort: 

4+0 Answers

 #1
avatar+25990 
+1

From your graph, I suggest the following:

 

1. (-inf, -4) U (-2, 3) U (4, 13)

 

2. (-4, -2) U (3, 4) U (13, inf)

 

3. (-3, -1) U (0, 2)

 

4. (-5, -3) U (-1, 0) U (2, 4) U (4, inf)

 

5. (-5, -1) U (-1, 1)

 

6. (1, 3)

 

7. (-inf, -5) U (3, 4) U (4, inf)

 

8. (-inf, -5)

Alan  Apr 26, 2017
 #2
avatar+223 
+1

How are you getting the 13?

Veteran  Apr 26, 2017
 #3
avatar+25990 
+1

Extrapolate the right-most line. For every 2 units reduction in y it increases by 3 units in x.

.

Alan  Apr 26, 2017
 #4
avatar+223 
0

Okay i understand, thanks

Veteran  Apr 26, 2017

5 Online Users

avatar
We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.  See details