What do the glas sizes have to be on a aquarium that is 160 liters so you use the least amount of glas and there isn't a glas on top. So no glas on top.
example: 10x4x4
Bottom: 10x4
Sides: 4x4x2
Forwards and back: 10x4x2
160L = 160,000cm^3
Not too sure about this one....but I believe that an edge of ∛160,000 ≈ 54.288 cm in each dimension will minimize the cost......total area of the glass = 5 * (∛160,000)^2 ≈ 14,736.126 cm^2
[ You forgot to convert liters to cm^3......your configuraion uses 4000 + 3200 + 8000 = 15.200cm^2 of glass ]
This lessens the required glass in your configuration by about 464cm^2
However....aquariums are not usually designed as cubes... [ maybe because of too much water pressure on the sides?? ]
Maybe two of our other members - Alan or Heureka - know of the most efficient [workable] design......???
I would say that a cube would minimize your glass surface area.....if you use tempered glass you can make a cube no problem...
dimensions would be x * x * x = 160000 x = 54.28 cm and you would need 5 of them (no top)
5 pieces of 54.28 x 54.28 glass (probably 3/16 (maybe 1/8th)temepered glass ...or acrylic))
I believe most aquariums are not cubes because they typically want to maximize the viewing from the FRONT, so the sides are usually smaller I once had a 40 gallon one that was octagon shaped.
Thanks, EP......!!!
I suspect that your reasoning for aquarium design is correct.....!!!
Hmm!
Let W = width, L = length, H = height
V = WLH A = WL + 2HL + 2WH
(i) W = L = H
V = W3 A = 5W2
(ii) L = 21/2W H = 2-1/2W
V = W* 21/2W*2-1/2W so V = W3 still.
A = W*21/2W + 2* 2-1/2W*21/2W + 2*W*2-1/2W so A = (21/2 + 2 + 21/2)W2
A = 2(1 + 21/2)W2 or A ≈ 4.828W2 i.e. a slightly smaller area for the same volume!