Hi Michael and guest,
I thought it was interesting too.
Here is a proof.
You may like to watch this video on finding the arg(z) first. It is good.
but really |z| is just the distance Z is from (0,0) on the complex number plane
and
arg(z) is just the angle z makes with the positive real axis. (at the origin of course)
ii=e−π/2proofii=e[ln(ii)]ii=ei[ln(i)]Now ln(z)=ln|z|+i*arg(z) soln(i)=ln|i|+i∗arg(i)ln(i)=ln(1)+i∗π2ln(i)=i∗π2ii=ei∗i∗π2ii=e−1∗π2ii=e−π2
You know what "i" stands for? Of course, it stands for √−1. So, what made you ask this question? Is it an assignment or just curiosity on your part? Or, are you studying "Complex numbers?" It's an interesting question, however!. But, I'm afraid that you may get lost in the explanation. It has a numerical value of: e^(-Pi/2)=0.207879576.........etc.
Hi Michael and guest,
I thought it was interesting too.
Here is a proof.
You may like to watch this video on finding the arg(z) first. It is good.
but really |z| is just the distance Z is from (0,0) on the complex number plane
and
arg(z) is just the angle z makes with the positive real axis. (at the origin of course)
ii=e−π/2proofii=e[ln(ii)]ii=ei[ln(i)]Now ln(z)=ln|z|+i*arg(z) soln(i)=ln|i|+i∗arg(i)ln(i)=ln(1)+i∗π2ln(i)=i∗π2ii=ei∗i∗π2ii=e−1∗π2ii=e−π2
I've never seen this treated so I thought I'd take a deeper look.
c=rceıθccı=(rceıθc)ı=rıceı2θc=rıce−θcNow what is rıc?rc=eln(rc)rıc=(eln(rc))ı=eıln(rc)so cı=eıln(rc)e−θc=e−θc(cos(ln(rc))+ısin(ln(rc)))Letting c=ırc=1,θc=π2ıı=e−π2(cos(ln(1))+ısin(ln(1)))=e−π2(cos(0)+ısin(0))=e−π2which is in agreement with Melody's answer