HaleyWoodall17

avatar
UsernameHaleyWoodall17
Score472
Membership
Stats
Questions 43
Answers 90

 #1
avatar+472 
0

You can solve a rational expressinor by, 

While adding and subtracting rational expressions is a royal pain, solving rational equations is much simpler. (Note that I don't say that it's "simple", just that it's "simpler".) This is because, as soon as you go from a rational expression (with no "equals" sign in it) to a rational equation (with an "equals" sign in the middle), you get a whole different set of tools to work with. In particular, you can multiply through on both sides of the equation to get rid of the denominators.

    • Solve the following equation:

This equation is so simple that I can solve it just by looking at it: since I have two-thirds equal tox-thirds, clearly x = 2. The reason this was so easy to solve is that the denominators were the same, so all I had to do was solve the numerators.

x = 2

    • Solve the following equation:


Now I can compare the numerators:To solve this, I can convert to a common denominator of 15:

x – 1 = 6 
x = 7

Note, however, that I could also have solved this by multiplying through on both sides by the common denominator:

x – 1 = 2(3) 
x – 1 = 6 
x = 7

When you were adding and subtracting rational expressions, you had to find a common denominator. Now that you have equations (with an "equals" sign in the middle), you are allowed to multiply through (because you have two sides to multiply on) and get rid of the denominators entirely. In other words, you still need to find the common denominator, but you don't necessarily need to use it in the same way.

Here are some more complicated examples:

    • Solve the following equation:

First, I need to check the denominators: they tell me that x cannot equal zero or –2 (since these values would cause division by zero). I'll re-check at the end, to make sure any solutions I find are "valid".

There are two ways to proceed with solving this equation. I could convert everything to the common denominator of 5x(x + 2) and then compare the numerators:

At this point, the denominators are the same. So do they really matter? Not really (other than for saying what values x can't be). At this point, the two sides of the equation will be equal as long as the numerators are equal. That is, all I really need to do now is solve the numerators:

15x – (5x + 10) = x + 2 
10x – 10 = x + 2 
9x = 12 
x = 12/9 = 4/3

Since x = 4/3 won't cause any division-by-zero problems in the fractions in the original equation, then this solution is valid. 

x = 4/3

I said there were two ways to solve this problem. The above is one method. Another method is to find the common denominator but, rather than converting everything to that denominator, I'll take advantage of the fact that I have an equation here, and multiply through on both sides by that common denominator. This will get rid of the denominators:

3(5x) – 1(5(x + 2)) = 1(x + 2) 
15x – 5x – 10 = x + 2 
10x – 10 = x + 2 
9x = 12 
x = 12/9 = 4/3

 

Oct 8, 2014
 #1
avatar+472 
0

Step by step solution :

Step  1  :

 Multiply 4 by c2-ab 

Trying to factor as a Difference of Squares :

 1.1      Factoring:  c2-ab 

Theory : A difference of two perfect squares,  A2 - B2  can be factored into  (A+B) • (A-B)

Proof :  (A+B) • (A-B) =
         A2 - AB + BA - B2 =
         A2 - AB + AB - B2 = 
         A2 - B2

Note :  AB = BA is the commutative property of multiplication. 

Note :  - AB + AB equals zero and is therefore eliminated from the expression.

Check :  c2  is the square of  c1 

Check :  a1   is not a square !! 
Ruling : Binomial can not be factored as the difference of two perfect squares

Equation at the end of step  1  :

 (((2•(a2))-bc)•2)-(4•(c2-ab)•(b2-ac)) = 0 

 

Step  2  :

 Multiply 4•(c2-ab) by b2-ac 

Trying to factor as a Difference of Squares :

 2.1      Factoring:  b2-ac 

Check :  b2  is the square of  b1 

Check :  a1   is not a square !! 
Ruling : Binomial can not be factored as the difference of two perfect squares

Equation at the end of step  2  :

 (((2•(a2))-bc)•2)-4•(c2-ab)•(b2-ac) = 0 

 

Step  3  :

 Multiply 2a2-bc by 2 

Trying to factor as a Difference of Squares :

 3.1      Factoring:  2a2-bc 

Check :  2  is not a square !! 

Ruling : Binomial can not be factored as the
difference of two perfect squares

Equation at the end of step  3  :

 2 • (2a2 - bc) - 4 • (c2 - ab) • (b2 - ac) = 0 

Step  4  :

Simplify 2•(2a2-bc) - 4•(c2-ab)•(b2-ac) 

Pulling out like terms :

 4.1     Pull out like factors :

   -4a2bc + 4a2 + 4ab3 + 4ac3 - 4b2c2 - 2bc  = 

  -2 • (2a2bc - 2a2 - 2ab3 - 2ac3 + 2b2c2 + bc) 

Trying to factor by pulling out :

 4.2      Factoring:  2a2bc - 2a2 - 2ab3 - 2ac3 + 2b2c2 + bc 

Thoughtfully split the expression at hand into groups, each group having two terms :

Group 1:  2b2c2 - 2ab3 
Group 2:  2a2bc - 2a2 
Group 3:  -2ac3 + bc 

Pull out from each group separately :

Group 1:   (ab - c2) • (-2b2)
Group 2:   (bc - 1) • (2a2)
Group 3:   (2ac2 - b) • (-c)
Looking for common sub-expressions :Group 1:   (ab - c2) • (-2b2)
Group 3:   (2ac2 - b) • (-c)
Group 2:   (bc - 1) • (2a2)

Bad news !! Factoring by pulling out fails : 

The groups have no common factor and can not be added up to form a multiplication.

Equation at the end of step  4  :

 -2 • (2a2bc - 2a2 - 2ab3 - 2ac3 + 2b2c2 + bc) = 0 

Step  5  :

Solve -2•(2a2bc-2a2-2ab3-2ac3+2b2c2+bc) = 0 

Equations which are never true :

 5.1      Solve :    -2   =  0

This equation has no solution.
A a non-zero constant never equals zero.

Solving a Single Variable Equation :

 5.2     Solve   2a2bc-2a2-2ab3-2ac3+2b2c2+bc  = 0 

In this type of equations, having more than one variable (unknown), you have to specify for which variable you want the equation solved.

We shall not handle this type of equations at this time.

Oct 8, 2014