All Answers 358087 Answers

11 + 11 = 22 

11 + 1 = 12

0.28571428571

105.

a result obtained by dividing one quantity by another.

Academically: 19 

Dank May-Mays: 21

A sky of stars and skyscrapers.

a + 5 > 8      subtract 5 from both sides

a >  3

The Pythagorean Theorem is c^2 = a^2 + b^2.

The moon.......

Nyan Cat....

A bird.....

A plane...

The ceiling. The sky. Life. Bannanas. Space

Here's the image :  

Just add the sides......that will give you the perimeter

sin (theta)   = cos ( 90 - theta)    ....so

sin (49)    =   cos ( 90 - 49)   =  cos (41)

2012-1982=30 30 years ago 

Angle MNL   = 90

So......LMN   +  MLN   = 90

So

71 +  MLN   =  90       subtract  71 from both sides

MLN   =  19      you were correct !!!!

! is called "factorial", which means this: 5! =5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1 =120.

Use this formula to find the Future Value:

FV=P{[1 + R]^N - 1/ R}

FV =500 x {[1 + 0.12/12]^(3*12) - 1 / 0.12/12}

FV =500 x {[ 1.01]^36 - 1 / 0.01}

FV =500 x              43.07687836....

FV =$21,538.44 - This is the FV of your annuity.

Yea, cats eat snakes!!!

I can only assume that this is a series of "S"'s in morse code...

YOU'LL NEVER TAKE THIS PLANET, SNAKE MAN!

OK, I know now what the problem is. Look at your question where you say "7% compounded monthly".

Your 7% is NOT compounded monthly!!!. It is compounded ANNUALLY!!. Which means we have to convert the interest rate of 7% compounded annually to compounded monthly.

And this is how you do that: 1.07^(1/12) =1.00565414538 - 1 x 1,200 =6.784974465%. This is the interest compounded monthly!!. Which is equivalent to 7% compounded annually. This will give you a monthly payment of $1,044.74  when you enter it in the above formula that I used.

No












 

WHy














just why

I know 10,551.10 is wrong. it was typed wrong it was suposed to be $1,551.10.  your answer $1,065.33 is wrong too.  After I give three wrong answers the correct answer is given. It says $1,044.74 per month.  It's not much different than what you said, but it still a wrong answer. Maybe it's a different formula than the one you used.

I agree