ilorty

avatar
Usernameilorty
Score1094
Membership
Stats
Questions 11
Answers 344

 #1
avatar+1094 
+2

Form an equation, but with what? You'll need variables, so make them! (Here is a lovely recipe for variables)

 

Let:

 

s = smallest number

m = middle number

l = largest number

 

But...you can't just add that!

 

Let's write everything in terms of "m".

 

s = m - 5

m = m

l = 2m + 3

 

Now...we add!

 

m - 5 + m + 2m + 3 = 42

4m - 2 = 42

4m = 44

m = 11

 

Now, we plug m back into the original variables:

 

s = 11 - 5 = 6

l = 2(11) + 3 = 25

 

So, the 3 numbers are [6, 11, 25]

 

Did you actually press on the link? No recipe? Just a definition? Sorry...have some cookies! (They are up at the top shelf of my pantry...they taste nice, but not as good as Ginger's banana daiquiri! I managed to sneak a sip...hope she doesn't realize!)

 

:)

Sep 1, 2020
 #1
avatar+1094 
+2

We need to sharpen our trig skills, because believe it or not, this problem involves trig!

 

Anyways, I assume we are allowed to use calculators. 
 

What we need to do is calculate the tangent divided by 7. Maybe you haven't seen the wonders a calculator could do, so I will show you step by step. 
 

1.  Tangents!

 

 

2. Tangent(35)

 

 

3. 7 divided by that:

 

4. Enter!

 

 

There! Rounded, that would be 10

 

Maybe youll learn how to use calculators ;P, don't we all just love them?

 

:)

Sep 1, 2020
 #1
avatar+1094 
+2

This calls for "casework", though not much of counting...

 

We first need to figure out a "not so specific" range for quarters. We see that:

 

25 - 17 = 8

 

Which means, she can have from 1 to 8 quarters, but that is not specific enough. We also need to calculate the total amount of dimes she has:

 

0.1 * 17 = 1.7

 

Now, we can start:

 

If there were 1 quarter:

 

Not possible: not enough for the minimum amount of money

 

If there were 2 quarters:

 

Not possible: not enough for the minimum amount of money

 

If there were 3 quarters:

 

Not possible: not enough for the minimum amount of money

 

If there were 4 quarters:

 

Not possible: not enough for the minimum amount of money

 

If there were 5 quarters:

 

Not possible: not enough for the minimum amount of money

 

If there were 6 quarters:

 

Not possible: not enough for the minimum amount of money

 

If there were 7 quarters:

 

Not possible: not enough for the minimum amount of money

 

If there were 8 quarters:

 

Not possible: not enough for the minimum amount of money

 

so leave your answer blank.

 

BUT!

 

We could have saw from before whether there would have been enough money or not!

 

If we multiply: 8 * 0.25 = 2, and add that to 1.7, we get 3.7. Not possible.

 

What I don't understand about this problem is: If they literally said that Akana had some dimes and quarters, and they said that this was true, why did they give a possibility of "not possible"? Akana, you probably discovered Roman Numeral 0.

 

:)

Sep 1, 2020
 #1
avatar+1094 
+2

In my opinion, there's no point of that extra triangle, maybe just there as a red herring...

 

Anyways, we can use the Pythagorean theorem on 12 and 6 to get y.

 

We know that:

 

a+ b= c2

 

Here is a lovely little picture that could help you wrap your mind around how it works:

 

 

So, what does this tell us? Well,  now we know this now:

 

12= 6+ y2
 

This now means:

 

144 = 36 + y2

 

Simplify:


108 = y2

 

Which means:

 

y = sqrt(108) = 6sqrt(3)

 

:)

Sep 1, 2020
 #1
avatar+1094 
+2
Sep 1, 2020
 #4
avatar+1094 
+1
Aug 31, 2020