Neither of those questions are the same as this one.
It’s interesting that you link to Ginger’s troll post. https://web2.0calc.com/questions/conditional-probability_7#r9 Did you notice your screwedup answer supports her position?
The number of permutations for screwing up a simple statistics question is truly mind boggling. I’ve always wondered what the number actually is. It may not actually have a ceiling --it seems as vast as space, and the time to do it is limited only by the imagination and cogitative lifespan of humankind.
It was this post that prompted my question about the intellectual thought process of the forum’s dickheads, prompting Gingerale’s very droll, satirical reply. This started because Ginger offered me a $50 (Bit Coin) wager on how that thread would conclude. (I took the wager and lost.)