TheXSquaredFactor

avatar
UsernameTheXSquaredFactor
Score2441
Membership
Stats
Questions 3
Answers 956

 #2
avatar+2441 
+1

Max0815, you are very close; all you need to consider is the potential overlap. Look at the diagrams below.
 

 

Source: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/eps-gif/QueensMax_800.gif

 

Look at these two arrangements of the rooks. The first set you considered was that every rook occupied every column. The second set you considered was that every rook occupied every row. The diagrams above show some positions that satisfy both conditions; all the rooks are in every column and every row only once. 

 

In order to figure out the overlap, ask yourself the following: How many ways can each rook occupy one and only one row and column? 

 

Edit: I realize that the diagrams contain queens--not rooks. Oops! I think the main point still remains, however, so I will keep the diagrams as is. 

Jun 26, 2018
 #1
avatar+2441 
+1

Constructing a diagram is a crucial step here; digesting all that information visually is extremely difficult without a visual aid. I have concocted one that I am proud of. I have tried to label everything in this diagram for your convenience. This problem most likely has many avenues toward achieving the correct answer, but I will present my approach for you:
 

 

In the diagram above, I have added point D, which is the intersection of point A and point C. The point lies on the origin. Let's focus on some characteristics regarding \(\triangle ACD\) .

 

Point A and point D have the same x-coordinate, so a vertical segment connects them. Point C and point D share the same y-coordinate, so they must be connected with a horizontal segment. \(\overline{AD}\perp\overline{DC}\) because horizontal and vertical lines are always perpendicular; thus, \(m\angle ADC=90^{\circ}\).

 

\(AD=DC=8\), so \(\triangle ACD\) is also an isosceles triangle.

 

A triangle that is both right and isosceles is also known as a 45-45-90 triangle. It is possible to observe these similarities with \(\triangle RSC\).

 

\(\overline{AD}\parallel\overline{RS}\) because they are both vertical lines. Whenever a parallel line cuts through a triangle, the resulting triangles are similar. In this case, \(\triangle ADC\sim\triangle RSC\)

 

\(DC=8\) and \(DS=a\) , so \(CS=8-a\) . Because \(\triangle RSC\) is isosceles, \(RS=CS=8-a\) . The area of this triangle, according to the original problem, is 12.5. We know the lengths of the side lengths, so we can determine the value of a.

 

\(12.5=\frac{1}{2}(8-a)(8-a)\) Multiply by 2 on both sides to solve for a. We are using the area of a triangle to generate this equation.
\(25=(8-a)^2\) Take the square root of both sides. 
\(5=|8-a|\)  
   

 

Yes, it is possible to solve for a here, and it is relatively simple from here on out. However, we can take a slight shortcut. The end goal is to determine the difference of x- and y-coordinates, but 8-a represents the height of the triangle. Since 8-a=5, we know that the y-coordinate is 5. 

 

 (3,5) is the coordinate of point R. \(|3-5|=2\)  is the positive difference.

 


 

Jun 24, 2018
 #1
avatar+2441 
+2

A standard deck of 52 cards comprises 13 cards of any particular suit. Although the problem never explicitly states whether or not replacement occurs, I will assume that there is no replacement. 

 

The problem is a compound event because there are two separate events that can satisfy the condition. They are the following:

 

  • Drawing two hearts
  • Drawing two diamonds

Calculating the probabilities of each event separately is probably the best way to undertake this problem. 

 

\(P(\text{2 hearts})=P(\text{1st heart})\cdot P(\text{2nd heart})\)  
\(P(\text{1st heart})=\frac{13}{52}=\frac{1}{4}\) In a conventional 52-card deck, there are 13 hearts. I have simplified this fraction. 
\(P(\text{2nd heart})=\frac{12}{51}=\frac{4}{17}\) Because I have assumed that there is no replacement, there will be only 51 cards remaining to choose from when someone draws the next heart. The removal of one heart caused the heart count to drop to 12 instead of 13. 
\(P(\text{2 hearts})=\frac{1}{4}\cdot \frac{4}{17}=\frac{1}{17}\)  
   


Of course, you could go through the above ordeal again; you could calculate the probability of the event of the first diamond and second diamond and then do the multiplication. However, you may be able to observe the parallelism. 13 diamonds are included in a 52-card deck. Drawing the first diamond and second diamond would, therefore, be probabilistically identical to drawing two hearts. This means that I already know the probability of drawing two diamonds: \(\frac{1}{17}\) .

 

\(P(\text{2 hearts or 2 diamonds})=P(\text{2 hearts})+P(\text{2 diamonds})-P(\text{2 hearts and 2 diamonds})\) When calculating compound events, this formula is used. Because there is no overlap, we can disregard it.
\(P(\text{2 hearts or 2 diamonds})=\frac{1}{17}+\frac{1}{17}-0=\frac{2}{17}\) There you go!
   
Jun 24, 2018
 #1
avatar+2441 
+3

This question requires some observation combined with knowledge of properties of parallelograms and triangle similarity.

 

Parallelograms, by definition, are quadrilaterals with opposite sides parallel. In this example, \(\overline{AD}\parallel \overline {FC}\) because of the previous statement. Because \(\overline{DF}\) intersects multiple segments, namely \(\overline{AD}\text{ and } \overline {FC}\)\(\overline{DF}\) is classified as a transversal. \(\angle ADF\text{ and }\angle F\) are a pair of angles known as alternate interior angles because they exist on opposite sides of the transversal while remaining on the "inner" side of the intersecting lines. Because \(\overline{AD}\parallel \overline {FC}\), the Alternate Interior Angles Theorem states that \(\angle ADF \cong \angle F\)\(\overline{AB}\) is another transversal bounded by parallel lines. Therefore, \(\angle A\cong \angle FBE\). Because there are two pairs of angles that are congruent in corresponding triangles, namely \(\angle ADF \cong \angle F\text{ and }\angle A\cong \angle FBE\), the Angle-Angle Similarity Theorem states that the triangles are similar. In this case, \(\angle AED\sim \triangle BEF\)

 

Even after all the logic above, I still do not any side lengths yet. There exists a constant of proportionality between similar triangles. Since the area of \(\triangle BEF\) requires an enlargement by a factor of 9 to obtain the area of \(\angle AED\), the constant of proportionality would be the square root of this. \(\sqrt{9}=3\). Therefore, each side length on the larger triangle is enlarged by a factor of 3. Because \(\overline{BF}\) and \(\overline{AD}\) are corresponding sides according to the triangle similarity statement and \(\overline{AD}\) is enlarged by 3, \(AD=3BF\)

 

One property of parallelograms is that opposite side lengths are also congruent. Because \(BC=AD\text{ and }AD=3BF \)\(BC=3FC\)

 

Using the principle of the Segment Addition Postulate \(FC=BF+BC=BF+3BF=4BF\)

 

Since the constant of proportionality for \(\triangle BEF\text{ and }\triangle CDF\) is 4, the area of \(\triangle CDF\) is 16. 

 

16-1=15, which is the area of the quadrilateral \(BCDE\)

 

\(A_{\text{ABCD}}=9+15=24\text{units}^2\)

.
Jun 19, 2018