legs of a triangle a, b, c
the triangle inequality states
|a|+|b|>|c|with strict inequality else we'd just have a line segment, not a triangle.
|c|<|39|+|15|=54⇒c<54we also must have |c|+|15|>39⇒c>24 thus24<c<54
If I understand what you're saying...4√abc=54√abcd=3√10
4√abcd4√abd=√d=3√105d=(3√105)2=9⋅1025=185
assuming a 365 day yearnblink=3blinkmin⋅60minhr⋅14hrday⋅365dayyr=3⋅60⋅14⋅365=919800blinkyrso no, not quite a million blinks per year
I think the easiest way to do this is to parameterize the circle via a single variable and solve the minimization problem.
let p be a point on the circle given by (x−12)2+(y+5)2=9then p can be described as p=(3cos(θ)+12, 3sin(θ)−5)
The squared distance of this point to the origin is d2=(3cos(θ)+12)2+(3sin(θ)−5)2=9sin2(θ)−30sin(θ)+9cos2(θ)+72cos(θ)+169=−30sin(θ)+72cos(θ)+178=78cos(θ+arctan(5/12))+178
d2will clearly be minimized when θ+arctan(5/12)=πθ=π−arctan(5/12)at this angle d2=−78+178=100d=10
The key here is to find x such that the determinant of F is zero.
det(F)=2⋅3−(−4)⋅x=6+4xsolving det(F)=0 we get6+4x=0x=−32
well let's multiply them
(4311)(1−3−14)=(1001)
so yes C and E are multiplicative inverses
There are a total of (62)=15 possible angles
But it turns out that many of the angles are congruent.
The 15 angles are made up of 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 copies of 5 different angles.
There are only 5 different possible angles
This is known as finding the partial fraction expansionx+7x2−x−2=x+y(x−2)(x+1)=Ax−2+Bx−1
x+7(x−2)(x+1)=A(x+1)+B(x−2)(x−2)(x+1)∀x:x≠2, −1x+7=A(x+1)+B(x−2)x=(A+B)x⇒1=A+B7=A−2B
B=1−A7=A−2(1−A)=3A−23A=9A=3B=1−3=−2x+7(x−2)(x+1)=3x−2−2x+1
let nc be the number of cups of lemonade sold and nb be the number of lemon bars sold.
we have 3 constraints 2⋅nc+1.5⋅nb≥5000.25nc+0.2nb≤100nc≥150
Oh oops, I missed that they called nc = x and nb = y, oh well you'll figure it out.
I don't see any solution method any better than just plugging in the points and checking.
so every pair but the first listed is acceptable.
The theorem being used here is that
gcd(an−1, am−1)=agcd(m,n)−1
in this case n=1001, m=1012
1001=7⋅11⋅131012=2⋅11⋅23so clearly gcd(1001, 1012)=11211−1=2047 as guest correctly computed
The proof of this theorem can be found online