Now, let's me explain my tactic. Hang with me, it's quite tedious.
Now first off, let's set a multivariable function to deal with this question,
First, let's let f(a,b,c)=(ab+ac+bc)3−a3b3−a3c3−b3c3. (This will come into handy later)
This following step is not necessary, as you can just easily follow through, but expanding everything, which is quite tedious, we get
3a3b2c+3a2b3c+3a3bc2+3a2bc3+3ab3c2+3ab2c3+6a2b2c2
Now, let's note that every term is divisble by 3abc. Factoring this out, we get
f(a,b,c,)=3abc(b2c+a2c+a2b+ab2+2abc+bc2+ac2)
The following steps are complicated, but I do believe this was explained in an AOPS course, which is where this problem came from.
(I know because I had the same problem while taking the course myself, it was a writing problem)
Let's note the following ideas.
If we let c=−a, we find that f(a,b,−a)=0, meaning that a+c is a factor of f(a,b,c)
If we let −a=b, we also find that f(a,−a,c)=0. This also means that a+b is a factor.
If we let b=−c, f(a,−c,c)=0. This also means that b+c is a factor.
This also means that (a+b)(b+c)(c+a) should be in the final factorization.
Wait a sec! Notice something really quickly!
(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)=b2c+a2c+a2b+ab2+2abc+bc2+ac2, which means that we can replace what we had in parethensis in the original facorization with (a+b)(b+c)(c+a)
Thus, our final factorization is 3abc(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)
Thus, our final answer is 3abc(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)
Thanks! :)