+0  
 
0
1079
1
avatar

2 + 4 i neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeed tooooooooooooooo knoowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

 Jun 25, 2015
 #1
avatar+427 
0

That's a lot of 0s. It's much faster to use scientific notation for it:

2 + 4 * 1045

Now we have a dilemma. There are two ways of reading this.

I think it's likely you meant this:

(2 + 4) * 1045 = 6.0 * 1045

But in the standard order of mathmatics, you would have this:

2 + (4 * 1045) = 4[fourty four 0's...]2

 Jun 25, 2015

3 Online Users

avatar