+0  
 
0
245
6
avatar

A triangle has an area of 200cm^2. Two sides of this triangle measure 26 and 40 cm respectively. Find the exact value of the third side.

Guest Mar 22, 2015

Best Answer 

 #1
avatar+81077 
+10

We'll have to use Heron's Formula to solve this.

Let  a = 26, b= 40 and x be the unknown side

s = the semi-perimeter  =  [x + 26 + 40]/2 = [x + 66]/2

So we have

200 = √[s(s -a)(s-b)(s-x)]

200^2  = [x + 66]/2 * [(x + 66)/2 - 26] * [(x + 66)/2 - 40]* [(x + 66)/2 - x] 

200^2 = [x + 66]/2 * [ x + 14]/2 * [x - 14]/2 * [66 - x]/2

200^2 = [x + 66] * [x + 14] * [x - 14] * [66- x] * (1/16)

40000 = [x + 66] * [x + 14] * [x - 14] * [66- x] * (1/16)

640000= [x + 66] * [x + 14] * [x - 14] * [66- x] 

We could brute force this.....but....I'm going to let WolframAlpha do the heavy lifting...

It returns two solutions

x = 2√89 ≈ 18.87   and  2√1049 ≈ 64.78

Both satisfy the Triangle Inequality.....so.....looking at the Law of Cosines

18.87^2  = 40^2 + 26^2 - 2(40)(26)cosΘ   

And the angle between the sides of 26 and 40 could be 22.6°

And using the Law of Sines, we have

sinΘ/40 = sin 22.6/18.87

sinΘ = 40sin22.6/18.87 =  54.55°

And the remaining angle is 180 - 22.6 - 54.55 = 102.85

But this is impossible because it would mean that the greatest angle is opposite the intermediate side

And using the Law of Cosines again, we have... 

64.78^2 = 40^2 + 26^2 - 2(40)(26)cosΘ 

So, the angle between the sides of 26 and 40 could be 157.38°

And using the Law of Sines again, we have

sinΘ/40 = sin 157.38/64.78 = 13.73°

And the remaining angle is 180 - 157.38 - 13.73 = 8.89°

So, the solution is

Side 64.78,  opposite angle = 157.38°

Side 40, oppsite angle 13.73°

Side 26, opposite angle 8.89°

So....the remaining unknown side is 64.78

Here's the approximate triangle

 

  

 

SEE MELODY'S ANSWER BELOW...THE SECOND SOLUTION IS POSSIBLE  !!!

CPhill  Mar 22, 2015
Sort: 

6+0 Answers

 #1
avatar+81077 
+10
Best Answer

We'll have to use Heron's Formula to solve this.

Let  a = 26, b= 40 and x be the unknown side

s = the semi-perimeter  =  [x + 26 + 40]/2 = [x + 66]/2

So we have

200 = √[s(s -a)(s-b)(s-x)]

200^2  = [x + 66]/2 * [(x + 66)/2 - 26] * [(x + 66)/2 - 40]* [(x + 66)/2 - x] 

200^2 = [x + 66]/2 * [ x + 14]/2 * [x - 14]/2 * [66 - x]/2

200^2 = [x + 66] * [x + 14] * [x - 14] * [66- x] * (1/16)

40000 = [x + 66] * [x + 14] * [x - 14] * [66- x] * (1/16)

640000= [x + 66] * [x + 14] * [x - 14] * [66- x] 

We could brute force this.....but....I'm going to let WolframAlpha do the heavy lifting...

It returns two solutions

x = 2√89 ≈ 18.87   and  2√1049 ≈ 64.78

Both satisfy the Triangle Inequality.....so.....looking at the Law of Cosines

18.87^2  = 40^2 + 26^2 - 2(40)(26)cosΘ   

And the angle between the sides of 26 and 40 could be 22.6°

And using the Law of Sines, we have

sinΘ/40 = sin 22.6/18.87

sinΘ = 40sin22.6/18.87 =  54.55°

And the remaining angle is 180 - 22.6 - 54.55 = 102.85

But this is impossible because it would mean that the greatest angle is opposite the intermediate side

And using the Law of Cosines again, we have... 

64.78^2 = 40^2 + 26^2 - 2(40)(26)cosΘ 

So, the angle between the sides of 26 and 40 could be 157.38°

And using the Law of Sines again, we have

sinΘ/40 = sin 157.38/64.78 = 13.73°

And the remaining angle is 180 - 157.38 - 13.73 = 8.89°

So, the solution is

Side 64.78,  opposite angle = 157.38°

Side 40, oppsite angle 13.73°

Side 26, opposite angle 8.89°

So....the remaining unknown side is 64.78

Here's the approximate triangle

 

  

 

SEE MELODY'S ANSWER BELOW...THE SECOND SOLUTION IS POSSIBLE  !!!

CPhill  Mar 22, 2015
 #2
avatar+91481 
0

I'm impressed Chris :)

check

 

$${\mathtt{0.5}}{\mathtt{\,\times\,}}\left({\mathtt{26}}{\mathtt{\,\small\textbf+\,}}{\mathtt{40}}{\mathtt{\,\small\textbf+\,}}{\mathtt{64.78}}\right) = {\frac{{\mathtt{6\,539}}}{{\mathtt{100}}}} = {\mathtt{65.39}}$$

 

$${\sqrt{{\mathtt{65.39}}{\mathtt{\,\times\,}}\left({\mathtt{65.39}}{\mathtt{\,-\,}}{\mathtt{26}}\right){\mathtt{\,\times\,}}\left({\mathtt{65.39}}{\mathtt{\,-\,}}{\mathtt{40}}\right){\mathtt{\,\times\,}}\left({\mathtt{65.39}}{\mathtt{\,-\,}}{\mathtt{64.78}}\right)}} = {\mathtt{199.730\: \!747\: \!341\: \!489\: \!712\: \!9}}$$

 

yes that is correct

Melody  Mar 22, 2015
 #3
avatar+91481 
+5

Until I came to this forum I had never heard of Heron's formula so I am going to do it without using Heron's formula.

 

 

$$\\A=(1/2)*a*b*sinC\\\\
200=(1/2)*26*40*sinC\\\\
sinC=\frac{400}{26*40}\\\\
sinC=\frac{5}{13}\\\\
cosC=\pm\frac{12}{13} \qquad $draw a triangle and use the pythagorean theorem to help you get this$\\\\
$now use cosine rule$\\\\
c^2=26^2+40^2\pm 2*26*40*\frac{12}{13}\\\\
c^2=26^2+40^2\pm 2*2*40*12\\\\
c^2=356,\;\; or\;\;c^2=4196\\\\
c^2=4*89,\;\; or\;\;c^2=4*1049\\\\
c=2\sqrt{89}\approx 18.8680cm,\;\; or\;\;c=2\sqrt{1049}\approx 64.7765cm$$

 

-----------------------------------

 

check  - using Heron's formula

 

check  $$2+\sqrt{89}$$       first

 

$$\\$s=the semi perimeter $\\\\
s= \frac{26+40+2\sqrt{89}}{2}=33+\sqrt{89}\\\\
A=\sqrt{s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c)}\\\\
A^2=s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c)\\\\
A^2=(33+\sqrt{89})(33+\sqrt{89}-2\sqrt89)(33+\sqrt{89}-26)(33+\sqrt{89}-40)\\\\
A^2=(33+\sqrt{89})(33-\sqrt{89})(7+\sqrt{89})(-7+\sqrt{89})\\\\
A^2=(33^2-89)(89-49)\\\\
A^2=1000*40\\\\
A^2=40000\\\\
A=200$$

 

OR

now check the other one using the approximation. 

semiperimeter=     $${\mathtt{0.5}}{\mathtt{\,\times\,}}\left({\mathtt{64.776\: \!5}}{\mathtt{\,\small\textbf+\,}}{\mathtt{40}}{\mathtt{\,\small\textbf+\,}}{\mathtt{26}}\right) = {\mathtt{65.388\: \!25}}$$

Area

$${\sqrt{{\mathtt{65.388\: \!25}}{\mathtt{\,\times\,}}\left({\mathtt{65.388\: \!25}}{\mathtt{\,-\,}}{\mathtt{40}}\right){\mathtt{\,\times\,}}\left({\mathtt{65.388\: \!25}}{\mathtt{\,-\,}}{\mathtt{26}}\right){\mathtt{\,\times\,}}\left({\mathtt{65.388\: \!25}}{\mathtt{\,-\,}}{\mathtt{64.776\: \!5}}\right)}} = {\mathtt{200.003\: \!028\: \!623\: \!087\: \!389\: \!9}}$$

 

------------------------------------------------

 

 

$$\\
\mathbf{\mbox{So there are 2 possible exact lengths for the 3rd side}}\\\\
\mathbf{2\sqrt{89}\;cm\;\;\;\; or\;\;\;\;\;2\sqrt{1049}\;cm}$$

 


 

Melody  Mar 22, 2015
 #4
avatar+81077 
+5

Thanks, Melody......when I checked again, that second solution IS possible, too!!!

Here is the other triangle that Melody found....

 

 GOOD JOB, MELODY !!!!   A POX ON ME !!!!

  

CPhill  Mar 23, 2015
 #5
avatar+91481 
0

Yes I had put a plus instead of a minus when I found the product of a conjugal pair. 

That was my error. I spent ages looking for that stupid mistake. :)

Why didn't you give yourself 3 points for your original answer?

Melody  Mar 23, 2015
 #6
avatar+81077 
0

My original amswer wasn't entirely correct.....you actually helped me to see MY dumb error...!!

 

  

CPhill  Mar 23, 2015

30 Online Users

avatar
avatar
avatar
avatar
We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.  See details