Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
 
+0  
 
0
8070
3
avatar

Let f(x)=3x4+x3+x2+1x2+x2. Give a polynomial g(x) so that f(x) + g(x) has a horizontal asymptote of 0 as x approaches positive infinity.

 

 

used latex on this one

 Apr 10, 2018
 #1
avatar+2446 
+3

Asymptotes are always expressed as equations because they are lines, so I would assume that the horizontal asymptote lies at y=0. 

 

Of course, horizontal asymptotes have many rules associated with them. In this case, we are concerned with the following rule: If the degree of the numerator is less than the degree of the denominator, then the horizontal asymptotes exists at the x-axis (also known as y=0). 

 

If we take f(x)=3(x4+x3+x2+1)x2+x2 and multiply it by 1x3, then we would have finished this problem. Therefore, let's find g(x) that does this.

 

3(x4+x3+x2+1)x2+x2+g(x)=3(x4+x3+x2+1)x3(x2+x2) Let's do some subtraction here.
g(x)=3(x4+x3+x2+1)x3(x2+x2)3(x4+x3+x2+1)(x2+x2) Let's convert the rightmost fraction into one with a common denominator so that further simplification is possible.
g(x)=3(x4+x3+x2+1)x3(x2+x2)3x3(x4+x3+x2+1)x3(x2+x2) Let's do some distributing.
g(x)=3x4+3x3+3x2+3x3(x2+x2)(3x7+3x6+3x5+3x3)x3(x2+x2) Now, subtract!
g(x)=3x73x63x5+3x4+3x2+3x3(x2+x2) Not a lot of simplification happens, though, but let's do it anyway!
   

 

You should see that, when adding g(x) to f(x), this results in a horizontal asymptote of y=0.

 Apr 11, 2018
 #2
avatar+2446 
+3

Well, I guess I committed a cardinal sin: I did not factor completely. I thought there was no way that either the numerator or denominator could have a common factor. How wrong I was!
 

 

 

3x73x63x5+3x4+3x2+3 First, factor out a common factor of -3 from every term.
3(x7+x6+x5x4x21) Well, I can use the rational root theorem to determine that 1 is a root of the seven-degree polynomial, so x1 must also be a factor. This results in the following result. After using synthetic division, I got the following!
3(x1)(x6+2x5+3x4+2x3+2x2+x+1) Let's worry about the denominator. 
x3(x2+x2) I was able to use factoring here, too, by finding the products of -2 that equal 1: 2 and -1. Let's complete the factoring, then!
x3(x1)(x+2)  
3(x1)(x6+2x5+3x4+2x3+2x2+x+1)x3(x1)(x+2) Look at that! x1 is a common factor. That's crazy! This leaves us with the following!
g(x)=3(x6+2x5+3x4+2x3+2x2+x+1)x3(x+2),x(x+2)0 and x1 I guess this is better!
   
TheXSquaredFactor  Apr 11, 2018
 #3
avatar+2237 
+2

Well X2, you discovered your own sin, repented and made reparations. You’re forgiven and absolved.laugh

GingerAle  Apr 11, 2018

1 Online Users

avatar