2log(a-2b) = loga + logb so log(a-2b)2 = logab
therefore (a-2b)2 = ab
expanding : a2 -4ab + 4b2 = ab
ie a2 - 5ab + 4b2 = 0
divide both sides by b2 : a2/b2 -5ab/b2 + 4 =0
ie (a/b)2 - 5(a/b) + 4 = 0
solving the quadratic for a/b gives (a/b - 1)(a/b - 4) = 0
therefore a/b =1 or a/b = 4
2 log (a - 2b ) = loga + log b
log (a - 2b)^2 = log (a*b)
This implies that
(a - 2b)^2 = ab
a^2 - 4ab + 4b^2 = ab
a^2 - 5ab + 4b^2 = 0
(a - 4b) (a - b) = 0
This implies that
a = 4b ⇒ a/b = 4 or
a - b = 0 ⇒ a = b ⇒ a/b = 1
Wondering if a/b =1 might be considered an extraneous (invalid) solution, as it would result in a
LOG (negative number) ??
No I don't think so as squaring a negative gives a positive
ie 2log(a-2b) =log (a-2b)2
That may be true, but on the left you still have a LOG (negative number) .....So I am confused.
2 Log (a-2b) = log(a-2b)^2
seems invalid as the left side of the equation is invalid if (a-2b) is negative
Does anyone know for SURE?
Help !
~EP
Perhaps the author of the question didn't believe it an issue otherwise they would have included that a-2b >= 0 in the question. I do see your dilemma but if you remember back to when you learnt all about logs and I guess it depends on how your teacher treated the topic. A logarithm as we know is the power of a base to obtain a given number. From this definition we get a whole new mathematics topic part of which is simplifications. The actual log law in question is that if we have a log of a power then : logbxn = nlogbx not the other way round. Of course the other way has been adopted also to help with simplification. Maybe there are those who think its a case of which came first the chicken or the egg?
The chicken ! No wait...... The egg! No, wait.....
Thanx for the clarification help !
~EP