Find the accumulated value of an investment of $15,000 for 5 years at an interest rate of 7% if the money is compounded continuously.
Why does Pe^(rt) work??
Look at
lim n →∞ (1 + r/n)^n
Let m = n/r So we have
lim m →∞ ( 1 + 1/m)^(r*m) =
lim m →∞ [(1 + 1/m)^m ] ^r but ... lim m →∞ (1 + 1/m)^m = e
So we have
e^r
And
Pe^[r(1)] = P(e^r) = would represent continuous compounding for one year
So....
Pe^(rt) =
P(e^r)(e^r)(e^r)........... where (e^r) is multiplied "t" times ....{representing "t" years (or periods)......}
And that's it.......!!!
Let there be n divisions of time in 1 year.
formula after 1 year 15000*(1+7/n)^n
after 5 years 15000*(1+7/n)^(n*5)
n approaches infinity:
lim n->infinity [15000*(1+7/n)^(n*5)
=15000*e^7*5
=15000*e^35
The proof is this, Melody.....it's in the way that "e" is defined...
e = lim as n →∞ (1 + 1/n)^n
Notice, that Anonymous is letting n, the number of compounding periods per year, grow larger and larger......if we theoretically make "n" "huge," then the number of compoundings per year ≈ "continuous" because the time intervals of compounding → 0........thus, we have an "infinite" number of compoundings per year of extremely short duration each....!!!!
This graph doesn't constitute a proof, but simply suggests that it's likely to be true (though you should have put 0.07 rather than 7 Melody!):
.
It wasn't me Alan, I didn't put anything but I also noticed that error, I suppose I should have said so :))
Why does Pe^(rt) work??
Look at
lim n →∞ (1 + r/n)^n
Let m = n/r So we have
lim m →∞ ( 1 + 1/m)^(r*m) =
lim m →∞ [(1 + 1/m)^m ] ^r but ... lim m →∞ (1 + 1/m)^m = e
So we have
e^r
And
Pe^[r(1)] = P(e^r) = would represent continuous compounding for one year
So....
Pe^(rt) =
P(e^r)(e^r)(e^r)........... where (e^r) is multiplied "t" times ....{representing "t" years (or periods)......}
And that's it.......!!!
Thank you Chris and Alan,
I have finally looked properly at what you are telling me, and hopefully I will remember.
I have always had problems with this because I could never see why it was true and I have a reall problem reproducing things when I don't really understand.
I did not know that e could be defined that way
I will try and remember.
e=limn→∞(1+1n)n