We use cookies to personalise content and advertisements and to analyse access to our website. Furthermore, our partners for online advertising receive pseudonymised information about your use of our website. cookie policy and privacy policy.
 
+0  
 
+2
119
6
avatar+93 

 

The complete graph of $y=f(x),$ which consists of five line segments, is shown in red below. (On this graph, the distance between grid lines is $1.$) Let $a$ and $b$ be the largest negative integer and the smallest positive integer, respectively, such that the functions $g(x)=f(x)+ax$ and $h(x)=f(x)+bx$ are invertible. What is $a^2+b^2?$

 

I think someone posted this question before, but it wasn't answered. I don't know how to draw the graph and he has it, the link for the graph is https://web2.0calc.com/questions/the-complete-graph-of-y-f-x-which-consists-of-five 

 

Anyway thanks!

 Jul 30, 2019
 #1
avatar+773 
+4

evan i am sorry i don't know how to do this but this is the graph

 Jul 30, 2019
edited by travisio  Jul 30, 2019
edited by travisio  Jul 30, 2019
edited by travisio  Jul 30, 2019
 #2
avatar+93 
+2

Thanks travisio the graph helps other problem solvers!

 Jul 30, 2019
 #3
avatar+773 
+2

your welcome

travisio  Jul 30, 2019
 #4
avatar+8725 
+3

For a function to be invertible, it must pass the "horizontal line test," which means you must not be able to draw a horizontal line that intersects the graph more than once. We can see the graph of  y = f(x)  by itself does not pass the horizontal line test and so is not invertible.

 

 

Let's imagine what  g(x)  would look like if  a = 1

g(x)  =  f(x) + ax       If   a = 1   then

g(x)  =  f(x) + x

 

Let's see what  g(1)  would be.

g(1)  =  f(1) + 1         And from the picture we can see   f(1)  =  -5

g(1)  =  -5 + 1

g(1)  =  -4                  So the point  (1, -4)  is on the graph of  g(x)

Adding the x-value to the y-value ended up shifting that point up.

 

Let's see what  g(3)  would be.

g(3)  =  f(3) + 3         And from the picture we can see  f(3)  =  2

g(3)  =  2 + 3

g(3)  =  5                  So the point  (3, 5)  is on the graph of  g(x)

Adding the x-value to the y-value ended up shifting that point up  (even more than last time).

 

Let's see what  g(-1)  would be.

g(-1)  =  f(-1) - 1           And from the picture we can see  f(-1)  =  3

g(-1)  =  3 - 1

g(-1)  =  2                     So the point  (-1, 2)  is on the graph of  g(x)

Adding the x-value to the y-value ended up shifting the point down.

 

Let's see what  g(-2)  would be.

g(-2)  =  f(-2) - 2           And from the picture we can see  f(-2)  =  5

g(-2)  =  5 - 2

g(-2)  =  3                     So the point  (-2, 3)  is on the graph of  g(x)

Adding the x-value to the y-value ended up shifting that point down (even more than last time).

 

And if we increase the value of  a , that will only exaggerate the changes.

 

By now we can see what  g(x)  should look like compared to  f(x)

Here is a graph of  f(x)  and  g(x)  with a slider for different values of  a:

 

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/eoqgwwn620

 

Moving the slider to the right until the graph "straightens out" enough to pass the horizontal line test, we can see that the smallest positive integer that makes  g(x)  invertible is  5. Moving the slider to the left (and zooming out as necessary), we can see that the largest negative integer that makes g(x)  invertible is  -4.

 

(-4)2 + 52   =   16 + 25   =   41

 Jul 31, 2019
 #5
avatar+93 
+3

Hectictar thank you so much! Sorry if i wasted your time. Your solution is clear, smart, and correct!

 Aug 2, 2019
 #6
avatar+8725 
+2

Thank you! Glad it was helpful laugh

hectictar  Aug 2, 2019

14 Online Users

avatar