+0  
 
+2
83
3
avatar+288 
 Feb 8, 2020
 #1
avatar+108624 
+1

I looked at one, although my answer may not be correct

The other already seemed to be looked at. I did not check for accuracy.

 Feb 9, 2020
 #2
avatar+288 
+1

Yeah, I checked at the one that geno3141 answered, and it seemed right and I understood the solution, but for some reason it's incorrect. I tried doing it again using his way and multiplied the fractions and got 64/405 but it was still incorrect.

 

So I'm not really sure about that problem.

AnimalMaster  Feb 9, 2020
 #3
avatar+108624 
0

I gave you a new answer under Gino's but it is probably not correct.

 Feb 10, 2020

18 Online Users

avatar
avatar