We use cookies to personalise content and advertisements and to analyse access to our website. Furthermore, our partners for online advertising receive pseudonymised information about your use of our website.
Please click on "Accept cookies" if you agree to the setting of cookies. Cookies that do not require consent remain unaffected by this, see
cookie policy and privacy policy.
DECLINE COOKIES

Find the sum of all the perfect squares (positive integers) of the form \(\frac{x}{4000-x}\)

where x is an integer

tertre Aug 2, 2017

#1**+1 **

Let's think about this problem; I've been begged to attempt to solve this problem, so I guess I will give it a shot:

\(\frac{x}{4000-x}=a^2\)

This represents the problem exactly.

Let's solve for *x:*

\(\frac{x}{4000-x}=a^2\) | Multiply by 4000-x on both sides of the equation. |

\(x=a^2(4000-x)\) | Distribute the a^2 to both terms inside of the parentheses. |

\(x=4000a^2-a^2x\) | Add a^2*x to both sides of the equation. |

\(x+a^2x=4000a^2\) | Let's factor out an x from both of the terms on the left hand side of the equation. |

\(x(1+a^2)=4000a^2\) | Divide by 1+a^2 on both sides of the equation. |

\(x=\frac{4000a^2}{1+a^2}\) | |

Ok, now let's try and think about this problem logically. \(a^2\) will never be divisible by \(1+a^2\) because adding one to a number means that the numbers are co-prime. Because of this, we do not have to consider any of the cases. The only time there will be integer solutions for *x *is when 4000 is divisible by \(1+a^2\); in other words, we need to know the factors of 4000.

The factors of 4000, in order, are \({1,2,4,5,8,10,16,20,25,32,40,50,80,100,125,160,200,250,400,500,800,1000,2000,4000}\). Now, we must set the denominator to all these values and solve:

First is 1. Here we go:

\(1+a^2=1\) | Subtract 1 on both sides of the equation |

\(a^2=0\) | Take the square root of both sides |

\(|a|=0\) | Split your answers into plus or minus. |

\(a=0\) | |

Here's a question, though. Is 0 a perfect square? Unfortunately, I am unsure about whether or not it is indeed a perfect square because definitions vary. Many people agree with the definition of if \(\sqrt{a}\in\mathbb{Z}\)where \({a}\in\mathbb{Z}\) , then that number is a perfect square. With that definition, 0 is a perfect square. However, some define it as \(\sqrt{a}\in\mathbb{N}\) where \({a}\in\mathbb{Z}\). In this case, 0 would be excluded. It's an open question, really, without a concrete answer. If you know whether or not an answer exists to this question, I would appreciate feedback. Anyway, let's try the next factor, 2:

You know what? There is a method to make this go even faster, anyway! Let's take the following set and subtract 1 from every term.

Now,\({1,2,4,5,8,10,16,20,25,32,40,50,80,100,125,160,200,250,400,500,800,1000,2000,4000}\)

transforms into \({0,1,3,4,7,9,15,19,24,31,39,49,79,99,124,159,199,249,399,499,799,999,1999,3999}\). Now, out of those, which ones are perfects squares? They are the following:

\(0,1,4,9,49\)

Now, take the square roots of the numbers in the set:

\(0,1,2,3,7\)

Therefore, the sum of the positive perfect square integers is \(0+1+2+3+7=13\).

TheXSquaredFactor Aug 3, 2017