We use cookies to personalise content and advertisements and to analyse access to our website. Furthermore, our partners for online advertising receive pseudonymised information about your use of our website.
Please click on "Accept cookies" if you agree to the setting of cookies. Cookies that do not require consent remain unaffected by this, see
cookie policy and privacy policy.
DECLINE COOKIES

If we could prevent 25% of disaster caused deaths, then we could save 0.25% of people who die each year!

If we could prevent 50% of deaths from disasters, then we could save 1.9% of people who die each year!

If we could prevent 75% of deaths from disasters, then we could save __xxx__ of people who die each year!

what is __xxx?__

Guest Apr 1, 2018

edited by
Guest
Apr 1, 2018

#1**0 **

Observe that the number of disaster-caused deaths prevented is doubled from the first statement to the second statement (25% > 50%) and the number of people saved per year goes from 0.25% to 1.9%. This means that doubling the deaths prevented results in the number of people saved multiplied by a factor of \({0.019\over0.0025}\), or 7.6. As an equation, this is \(2d=7.6D\), wherein **d** is the number of disaster-caused deaths prevented, and **D** is the number of total deaths prevented.

Now, observe that the number of disaster-caused deaths prevented is tripled from the first statement to the third statement. To find how much the number of total deaths prevented, we just need to manipulate the equation we derived earlier:

\({3\over2}*2d={3\over2}*7.6D\)

\(3d=11.4D\)

By tripling the number of disaster-caused deaths prevented, we multiply the number of total deaths prevented per year by 11.4. Now, since **d** tripled from the first statement to the third, we must multiply 0.25% by 11.4. Doing this, we get **2.85% of deaths prevented each year.**

(tbh i'm not very confident with this answer, but it was the best I could do)

Mathhemathh Apr 1, 2018