We use cookies to personalise content and advertisements and to analyse access to our website. Furthermore, our partners for online advertising receive pseudonymised information about your use of our website.
Please click on "Accept cookies" if you agree to the setting of cookies. Cookies that do not require consent remain unaffected by this, see
cookie policy and privacy policy.
DECLINE COOKIES

#3**+10 **

Mmm Well there are 4 ways to get from E to F

Now going from F to G

If you horizontal first then there are 4 ways

if you go down1 then across there are 3 ways

if you go down 2 then across there ae 2 ways

if you go all the way down first then there is 1 way.

4+3+2+1=10 ways

If that is correct then there would be 4*10=40 ways to go from E to F to G

Melody Apr 2, 2015

#2**+10 **

The ways to get from E to F = [1 + 3] ! / [1! * 3!] = 4!/3! = 4 ways

Ways to get from F to G = [3 + 2]! / [3! * 2! ] = 5! / 12 = 120 / 12 = 10 ways

So

4 ways x 10 ways = 40 ways to go from E to G through F

CPhill Apr 2, 2015

#3**+10 **

Best Answer

Mmm Well there are 4 ways to get from E to F

Now going from F to G

If you horizontal first then there are 4 ways

if you go down1 then across there are 3 ways

if you go down 2 then across there ae 2 ways

if you go all the way down first then there is 1 way.

4+3+2+1=10 ways

If that is correct then there would be 4*10=40 ways to go from E to F to G

Melody Apr 2, 2015

#5**+5 **

I actually can't take much credit for this one.......the answer comes straight from a "formula" supplied by Nauseated....

For any R x C grid arrangement where R represents the rows and C represents the columns.....the number of distinct paths from one corner of the grid to a diagonally opposite corner is given by :

(R + C ) ! / [R! * C! ]

CPhill Apr 2, 2015

#6**+5 **

Minimum amount of steps E -> F -> G is 8, but 9 steps is required.

I.e. E -> F in 4 steps & F -> G in 5 steps, or E -> F in 5 steps & F -> G in 4 steps.

So is 40 ways to go from E to F to G in **8 **steps, or did you somehow take that additional step into account?

(I don't have spare time to calculate, so cannot check this.. so just wondering)

Guest Apr 2, 2015

#7**+5 **

Hi anon, thanks for getting involved - we like that.

However, the minimum number is 9. 5 across and 4 down

I don't know where you got 8 from? :)

Hi Chris,

Yes i thought that might be Nauseated's formula, It is nifty,

There are so many formuas for so many things i cannot remember them all.

I suppose i should try and organise a file for some of these new ones.

Melody Apr 2, 2015