Why must Kyle's and Tynessa's pattern rules be the same, even though their algebraic expressions look different?
Kyles algebraic expression based on his coloring
f(n)=2+2(n+1)
Tynessa's algebraic expression based on his coloring
4+2n
I have already colored the blocks
2 + 2(n+1) = (via distributive property)
2 + 2n + 2 =
4 + 2n exactly the same as Ther's (Not sure this is what you wanted.....)