+0  
 
+3
350
4
avatar+1832 

I solved this question that way 

 

 

 

But the answer in the solution manual is 

 

 

 

I don't understand why they made it -x in the denominator 

xvxvxv  Oct 7, 2014

Best Answer 

 #1
avatar+26750 
+13

The original form of the denominator shows it is positive for all values of x (even when x is negative).  Therefore, if you take x outside the square root sign, you must still keep the denominator positive, so if x is negative you must have -x, instead of just x, to keep it positive.

To convince yourself that this is the right thing to do look at the following graph:

limit

Alan  Oct 7, 2014
 #1
avatar+26750 
+13
Best Answer

The original form of the denominator shows it is positive for all values of x (even when x is negative).  Therefore, if you take x outside the square root sign, you must still keep the denominator positive, so if x is negative you must have -x, instead of just x, to keep it positive.

To convince yourself that this is the right thing to do look at the following graph:

limit

Alan  Oct 7, 2014
 #2
avatar+92781 
+3

Thank you Alan,

I was really puzzling over that one.  

Melody  Oct 7, 2014
 #3
avatar+1832 
+3

Thank you Alan .. you are brilliant 

xvxvxv  Oct 7, 2014
 #4
avatar+92781 
+8

YES HE IS!!!

Melody  Oct 7, 2014

10 Online Users

New Privacy Policy

We use cookies to personalise content and advertisements and to analyse access to our website. Furthermore, our partners for online advertising receive information about your use of our website.
For more information: our cookie policy and privacy policy.