+0  
 
0
630
3
avatar+1832 

 Oct 8, 2014

Best Answer 

 #1
avatar+33661 
+10

A kinematics equation relates final speed, v, initial speed u, distance s and acceleration, a, by  v2 = u2 + 2*a*s  when a is constant.

 

In the situation here, v = 0 (it slows to zero at its highest point before coming back down), and a = -g (the acceleration of gravity, g, is constant and downward). So

 

0 = u2 - 2*g*s

 

Add 2*g*s to both sides

2*g*s = u2

 

Divide both sides by 2*g

s = u2/(2*g)   ...(1)

 

To reach a height of 3s we need initial velocity of U, say, so we would have:

3s = U2/(2*g)

 

Replacing s using (1) we get

3*u2/(2*g) =U2/(2*g)

 

Multiply both sides by 2g

3u2 = U2

 

Take the square root of both sides

U = u*√3

 

So the new initial velocity would have to be √3 times as big as the original.

 Oct 8, 2014
 #1
avatar+33661 
+10
Best Answer

A kinematics equation relates final speed, v, initial speed u, distance s and acceleration, a, by  v2 = u2 + 2*a*s  when a is constant.

 

In the situation here, v = 0 (it slows to zero at its highest point before coming back down), and a = -g (the acceleration of gravity, g, is constant and downward). So

 

0 = u2 - 2*g*s

 

Add 2*g*s to both sides

2*g*s = u2

 

Divide both sides by 2*g

s = u2/(2*g)   ...(1)

 

To reach a height of 3s we need initial velocity of U, say, so we would have:

3s = U2/(2*g)

 

Replacing s using (1) we get

3*u2/(2*g) =U2/(2*g)

 

Multiply both sides by 2g

3u2 = U2

 

Take the square root of both sides

U = u*√3

 

So the new initial velocity would have to be √3 times as big as the original.

Alan Oct 8, 2014
 #2
avatar+129852 
0

Very nice, Alan......this explanation makes total sense........

 

 Oct 8, 2014
 #3
avatar+1832 
0

Thank you alan, now its very clear 

 Oct 9, 2014

1 Online Users

avatar