Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
 
+0  
 
+1
1350
6
avatar+118703 

Can you help me with this exercises? please. ;D!

1) ln (4-x) + ln(2) = 2 ln(x)

2) log5(2x-1) = 2

3) mx+1 : mx-1

 

Are these your intended questions Paulina?  Number 3 doesn't make sense.

Paulina, you have to hit the "post answer" button at the bottom.

then tell me if what I have written is correct.

--------------------------------------------------

Note to other people.

(I am putting Paulina's questions here because she is new and it is all too confusing)

 Jun 16, 2014

Best Answer 

 #5
avatar+2354 
+10

I'm not 100% sure but I thought there's some rule that

ln(xk)forx>0,k>0=kln(x)

I think that for x<0 it's simply not true

 Jun 16, 2014
 #1
avatar+118703 
+5

1) ln (4-x) + ln(2) = 2 ln(x)

ln(2(4x))=ln(x2)82x=x2x2+2x8=0(x+4)(x2)=0x=4orx=2

now I am confused as well.

You cannot have  the ln of a negative number so I guess x=2

 Jun 16, 2014
 #2
avatar+118703 
0

Now Paulina - you have to respond by hitting the post answer button.

 Jun 16, 2014
 #3
avatar+130477 
+10

Melody's first answer is correct....here's a graph of the solution....

 

As for the second question, we have........ log5(2x-1) = 2.........in exponential form, we have

52 = 2x-1

25 = 2x -1     subtract 1 from both sides

26 = 2x         divide by 2

13 = x

And there you go......

 Jun 16, 2014
 #4
avatar+118703 
0

This one was confusing me a bit.

ln (x)2 = 2ln(x)

but with 2ln(x) x must be >0

and with ln (x)2  x is just in the set of reals.

How does that work???

 Jun 16, 2014
 #5
avatar+2354 
+10
Best Answer

I'm not 100% sure but I thought there's some rule that

ln(xk)forx>0,k>0=kln(x)

I think that for x<0 it's simply not true

reinout-g Jun 16, 2014
 #6
avatar+118703 
0

That is interesting reinout.  I guess it has to be something like that.  Thankyou for commenting on this one.

 

 Jun 17, 2014

3 Online Users