Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
 
+0  
 
+16
1473
4
avatar+1886 

PLEASE SHOW ALL WORKING (KEYWORD IS ALL)

 Feb 19, 2017

Best Answer 

 #3
avatar+33654 
+15

Here's a similar derivation, but makes explicit use of partial fractions:

 

.

 Feb 19, 2017
 #1
avatar+118703 
+15

ok

x=u2+1dx=2udu x1=u2u20sox1u=±x1Rather than having x=u2+1I am going to have u=+x1Everything else is the same but I don't have to worry about the negative posibility

 

 

 

12xx+1dx=12(u21)u2udu=1u21du=11u2du=tanh1(u)+cequivalent for restricted values (from Wofram|alpha) 

 

=12[ln1u1+u]+c=12[ln1u1+u]+c=12[lnu1u+1]+c Now c can be replaced with logAWhere A is a constant >0I do not know why this condition was not given...=ln[u1u+1]1/2+lnA=ln[A[u1u+1]1/2]=ln[A[u1u+1]]u=x+1=ln[Ax+11x+1+1]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

 Feb 19, 2017
 #3
avatar+33654 
+15
Best Answer

Here's a similar derivation, but makes explicit use of partial fractions:

 

.

Alan Feb 19, 2017
 #4
avatar+118703 
+10

Thanks for showing us this way Alan :)

I saw that difference of 2 squares there I thought of partial fractions but I don't know how to use them very well.  sad

I can learn from you answer :))

Melody  Feb 19, 2017

0 Online Users