We use cookies to personalise content and advertisements and to analyse access to our website. Furthermore, our partners for online advertising receive pseudonymised information about your use of our website.
Please click on "Accept cookies" if you agree to the setting of cookies. Cookies that do not require consent remain unaffected by this, see
cookie policy and privacy policy.
DECLINE COOKIES

X = 10^10^100

What does that mean?

\(X=(10^{10})^{100}\) \(X=10^{(10^{100})}\)

**Please reply with reason.**

asinus Sep 5, 2017

#3**+1 **

Hmmm... I'm sorry for not explaining the exponent towers earlier. I'll try my best to give a logical explanation on why exponent towers should be evaluated from the top downward despite it possibly being counterintuitive. To answer your original question, \(10^{10^{100}}=10^{\left(10^{100}\right)}\)

Let's use the variables a, b, and c and suppose that \(a^{b^{c}}=\left(a^{b}\right)^c=a^{bc}\), then the existence of exponent towers would be completely unnecessary as only one level of the exponent would ever be necessary; there must be a reason for such notation to exist.

Another reason is that it is consistent with the order of operations. Exponents is a level below parentheses when it comes to priority, but the order of operations applys to the power, too. Here's an example:

\(2^{2+3}=2^5=32\)

\(3^{2*2}=3^4=81\)

And therefore, you must evaluate the exponent within the exponent. Does this make sense?

I learned today that even modern-day programs calculate have ambiguity in the matter. Excel 2013 is an example, as \(2^{3^2}\) outputs 64 as opposed to 256. In the future,

TheXSquaredFactor Sep 6, 2017

#1**+1 **

X = (10^10)^100 = (10,000,000,000)^100 = 10^(10*100) = 10^1,000.

X = 10^(10^100) = 10^(1 + 100 zeroes) = 10 ^ 10 ^ 100 = 10^googol.

Guest Sep 5, 2017

#3**+1 **

Best Answer

Hmmm... I'm sorry for not explaining the exponent towers earlier. I'll try my best to give a logical explanation on why exponent towers should be evaluated from the top downward despite it possibly being counterintuitive. To answer your original question, \(10^{10^{100}}=10^{\left(10^{100}\right)}\)

Let's use the variables a, b, and c and suppose that \(a^{b^{c}}=\left(a^{b}\right)^c=a^{bc}\), then the existence of exponent towers would be completely unnecessary as only one level of the exponent would ever be necessary; there must be a reason for such notation to exist.

Another reason is that it is consistent with the order of operations. Exponents is a level below parentheses when it comes to priority, but the order of operations applys to the power, too. Here's an example:

\(2^{2+3}=2^5=32\)

\(3^{2*2}=3^4=81\)

And therefore, you must evaluate the exponent within the exponent. Does this make sense?

I learned today that even modern-day programs calculate have ambiguity in the matter. Excel 2013 is an example, as \(2^{3^2}\) outputs 64 as opposed to 256. In the future,

TheXSquaredFactor Sep 6, 2017