+0  
 
0
1518
7
avatar

The prime factorization of 1995, which is 3*5*7*19, uses each odd digit exactly one and 1995 is the smallest positive integer with this property. What is the next smallest?

 

Please show steps for solving. 

 Aug 6, 2016

Best Answer 

 #6
avatar+9665 
+10

Melody, 179 x 3 x 5 = 2685 is smaller and fits in the requirement.

 Aug 7, 2016
 #1
avatar
0

Sorry, I don't understand your question!!. ALL prime factors of any number are always ODD. The only exception is 2, which is EVEN. Why did you pick 1995? Why not:1155=3x5x7x11, or 1365=3x5x7x13....and so on.

 Aug 6, 2016
 #2
avatar
0

3*5*7*19=1995. The factors have 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 in them (the first 5 odd numbers). Since you want to find the next lowest number with this property, you have two options. When you multiply two positive integers (say x and y), what you are doing is ((((x+y)/2)-((abs(y-x))/2))*(((x+y)/2)+((abs(y-x))/2))), or ((((x+y)/2)^2)-(abs(y/2-x/2))). So the farther apart x and y are, the lower answer you get (10*10=100, 11*9=99, 10+10=20, 11+9=20, abs(10-10)=0, abs(11-9)=2). So the options are 1*5*7*39, or 3*5*9*17. The first option is problematic because 1 isn't prime, so it would have to be 7*15*39. 3*5*9*17=2295, while 7*15*39=4095. If you try to improve on this, it eventually leads back to 3*5*9*17. So the answer is 2295.

 Aug 6, 2016
 #3
avatar
0

For 4 integers (w, x, y, z), it is ((((w+x+y+z)/4)-((abs(z-y-x-w))/4))*(((w+x+y+z)/4)+((abs(z-y-x-w))/4))). I think (not 100% sure).

 Aug 6, 2016
 #4
avatar
0

Nevermind. Doesn't work.

 Aug 6, 2016
edited by Guest  Aug 6, 2016
edited by Guest  Aug 6, 2016
 #5
avatar+118658 
0

Guest 2, yours does not work because 9 is not a prime number.

 

The prime factorization of 1995, which is 3*5*7*19, uses each odd digit exactly one and 1995 is the smallest positive integer with this property. What is the next smallest?

 

Please show steps for solving. 

 

1 and 9 are the only digits that is not prime so they have to be used in conjuction with  digits

 

Mmm

maybe   3*5*7*91

No, 91 is not prime so that is not any good :(

So I want the smallest 3 digit number containing 9,1 and either 3,5,or 7

 

mabe   139*5*7

139 is prime  :)

 

So I am going with 139*5*7 = 4865

 Aug 7, 2016
 #6
avatar+9665 
+10
Best Answer

Melody, 179 x 3 x 5 = 2685 is smaller and fits in the requirement.

MaxWong  Aug 7, 2016
 #7
avatar+118658 
0

Yes - Good work Max :))

 Aug 7, 2016

4 Online Users

avatar
avatar
avatar