+0  
 
0
715
1
avatar+8 
Hi i'm new here i just wanted to know if my very very hard work in 13 years of hopeless researches will ever be worth... :\

I have found a way to "cross-connect" combinations inside and between dimensions of encryptions...
Yes... it is an "interdimensional-crypto-core-system" (this is how i use to call it since i was about 9 -10 years old and don't want to change it )
it is a "crypto-core" system because everything is supposed to end in one point... in the "core" which actually is also the "KEY" of the whole system.
Which means you have to "crack" the whole code in the old classic way,by finding all the pieces of the puzzle.
But then you will still only have the key,nothing more because even the key and even the result it can only be readed in an encrypted "language"
(because there is no other way to make it mean anything... after all it is worth to do anything you can to protect something like this...)

Actually i came here to ask you if anyone can find even a close number at how long would it take to crack a code like this by trying all the combinations
till it stops from 1 to the end because i am sleeping here and i'm so tired after 3 weeks of "brain-squeeze" marathon
just remember to say all the details possible of the computer you were based on.
thank you very very much and sorry for the long text and bed writing
(it could be worst )

The only information you need to know to make the count is based on the supposed "byte" and this is the actual "byte" that is being used
because this is the only one i can "use" so far (at least as a supposition of the "real" calculations) and his full unrepeatable combinations
just like we have 10 unrepeatable combinations in one digit in decimal system this system has this big number which is used to put only a few letters together

And the magic number is....

2432902008176640000

I know it doesn't look like a big deal but to put this out of less than 5 letters took me 13 years just to get to some point it's a long way to make it work right.
 Jan 8, 2014

Best Answer 

 #1
avatar+118654 
+5
You need to be more precise with what you are asking
 Jan 9, 2014
 #1
avatar+118654 
+5
Best AnswerYou need to be more precise with what you are asking
Melody Jan 9, 2014

3 Online Users

avatar
avatar
avatar