We use cookies to personalise content and advertisements and to analyse access to our website. Furthermore, our partners for online advertising receive pseudonymised information about your use of our website.
Please click on "Accept cookies" if you agree to the setting of cookies. Cookies that do not require consent remain unaffected by this, see
cookie policy and privacy policy.
DECLINE COOKIES

#1**0 **

AngelRay, my strategy here would be to convert all inequalities to slope-intercept form (\(y=mx+b\)). Converting to slope-intercept form is useful because the form gives one information about how a graph should look. I can, then, compare this information with the four graphs given.

\(x-y<-1\) | Add x to both sides. |

\(-y<-x-1\) | Divide by -1 on both sides. Doing this causes an equality signage change. |

\(y>x+1\) | |

The point-intercept form gives us some information about the corresponding graph of this equation. I will name two of these.

- The slope is 1
- The y-intercept is located at \((1,0)\)

Every graph appears to have the correct slope, but the coordinate of the y-intercept changes from graph to graph. Only the first and last graphs have a y-intercept of \((1,0)\) . Therefore, we have already eliminated two graphs from the list. Notice that the inequality would result in a dashed line. Only the last graph accounts for this technicality, so the bottom-right one is the correct graph.

TheXSquaredFactor Mar 4, 2018