Do you still think abcde...bs served a big pile of BULLSHIT as an early Christmas present?
Hell Yes! In addition, for the second round he served a well-muckraked, circular pile of steaming BULLSHIT! This is worthy of a Fields MeTal nomination. Category: Organic Houdini Processing Algorithms for Pseudo-Mathematical Solutions.
So, it seems in the twenty hours (19 hours and 47 minutes actually) it took for abcde...bs to post his link, he went to the North Pole, collected a muck rake from Farther Christmas, then went to the South Pole to consult with the penguins, waved to Melody while crossing Australia, then corrected his equation(s) by muck-raking the original BS into circles that will actually converge.
A fair amount of effort, but it is NOT a solution to this question! At best it will only confirm a known solution set. If the solution-set was unknown it could take hours to intuit the size and movement of the circle to find number set. Move the sliders while looking only at the graph and try to make it fit. It’s not obvious!
Incrementing the sliders sequentially from their lowest settings will require 74,235 iterations. At one step per second it will take 20 hours and 37 minutes. Some of it can be intuited, but it still will require hours.
Abcde, you are doing yourself disservice pursuing pseudo-mathematical solutions, because you’ve stopped looking for the correct solution methods. And others who will read your post may also slide down the slippery-slope into BS infused muck.
You have the skills to correctly translate complex equations into circles (perhaps this came from the consultation with the penguins) this is not a casual skill. This means you know a third of what’s needed to actually solve these numerically. The next step is to learn how to invert circle equations....
----------
Also someone took the point off your post above.
I noticed. It’s a prerogative of the trolled. I’ve also noticed through the years that no one is more concerned about my points than you. So, now I know for sure it’s you, JB (like I wouldn’t have, anyway). You should claim your copyright.
GA
--. .-
Hi Ron,
I just doubled checked; your cat’s name is available for use on this forum, and so is Ron [catname].
The moronic post above is consistent with the themes of with our forum’s new Village Idiot –the syntax is a little different from his style. Our village idiot usually signs his name–even when posting as a guest. So maybe it’s his brother, Crooked.
I doubt anyone with a functional brain (who knows you) would think you wrote that. ...Your style is more Gracie Allen.
LoooooooooooL
Your Esterbrook Metaphor is very cool. My Great Uncle Cosmo sometimes used the metaphor in the exact sam context. He actually used a nineteenth century Esterbrook fountain pen for personal correspondence. Cosmo’s pen now resides in a china cabinet, along with the Sheffield twin-lens magnifier, and several other curios and artifacts of my young and near-adult childhood.
----
Did you see this post? https://web2.0calc.com/questions/quadratic_48312#r3
GA
--. .-