+0  
 
0
1
2675
1
avatar

$${\left({\mathtt{1}}{\mathtt{\,\small\textbf+\,}}{\mathtt{x}}\right)}^{{\mathtt{n}}} = {\mathtt{1}}{\mathtt{\,\small\textbf+\,}}{\frac{{\mathtt{nx}}}{{\mathtt{1}}{!}}}{\mathtt{\,\small\textbf+\,}}{\frac{\left({n}{\left({\mathtt{n}}{\mathtt{\,-\,}}{\mathtt{1}}\right)}{\mathtt{\,\times\,}}{{\mathtt{x}}}^{{\mathtt{2}}}\right)}{{\mathtt{2}}{!}}} \Rightarrow \left\{ \begin{array}{l}{\mathtt{x}} = {\mathtt{\,-\,}}\left({\sqrt{{\mathtt{2}}}}{\mathtt{\,\times\,}}{\sqrt{{\frac{\left({\left({\mathtt{x}}{\mathtt{\,\small\textbf+\,}}{\mathtt{1}}\right)}^{{\mathtt{n}}}{\mathtt{\,-\,}}{\mathtt{nx}}{\mathtt{\,-\,}}{\mathtt{1}}\right)}{{n}{\left({\mathtt{n}}{\mathtt{\,-\,}}{\mathtt{1}}\right)}}}}}\right)\\
{\mathtt{x}} = {\sqrt{{\mathtt{2}}}}{\mathtt{\,\times\,}}{\sqrt{{\frac{\left({\left({\mathtt{x}}{\mathtt{\,\small\textbf+\,}}{\mathtt{1}}\right)}^{{\mathtt{n}}}{\mathtt{\,-\,}}{\mathtt{nx}}{\mathtt{\,-\,}}{\mathtt{1}}\right)}{{n}{\left({\mathtt{n}}{\mathtt{\,-\,}}{\mathtt{1}}\right)}}}}}\\
\end{array} \right\}$$
 what is this used for?

 Jun 27, 2015

Best Answer 

 #1
avatar+33615 
+10

The expression in the subject title of your question illustrates the first few terms of the binomial expansion (which has lots of uses in mathematics) - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_theorem for more information.

 

In the body of your question the solver has assumed you want to equate the left-hand side with the right-hand side and has assumed nx is a variable in its own right (it doesn't recognise implicit multiplication).  Strangely, it has also assumed (1+x)n is also a single variable (!) and has solved the equation as if it were a quadratic.

.

 Jun 28, 2015
 #1
avatar+33615 
+10
Best Answer

The expression in the subject title of your question illustrates the first few terms of the binomial expansion (which has lots of uses in mathematics) - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_theorem for more information.

 

In the body of your question the solver has assumed you want to equate the left-hand side with the right-hand side and has assumed nx is a variable in its own right (it doesn't recognise implicit multiplication).  Strangely, it has also assumed (1+x)n is also a single variable (!) and has solved the equation as if it were a quadratic.

.

Alan Jun 28, 2015

0 Online Users