We have ..... h(x) = x2 + 4
And I'm not sure, but I think this person might be wanting to evalute the composite function (h º h)(a)
This says to put "a" into f(x), and then put that result back into f(x) and evaluate again ................. (very odd, indeed !!!)
So we have......
h(a) = a2 + 4 and "plugging" this result back into h(x), we have
h(a2 + 4) = (a2 + 4)2 + 4 = a4 + 8a2 + 20
And that's (h º h)(a) ...... (If that was the original intent !! )
Ok wow thats tough I dont think thats possible. So no, this is not a helpful answer to your desperate plea. Sorry...
I am really guessing here - would someone like to verify please.
Plus I do not know how to use the notation properly.
h(x)=x^2+4 (h∘h)(a)
(x2+4)2+4$subina$=(a2+4)2+4=a4+8a2+16+4=a4+8a2+20
We have ..... h(x) = x2 + 4
And I'm not sure, but I think this person might be wanting to evalute the composite function (h º h)(a)
This says to put "a" into f(x), and then put that result back into f(x) and evaluate again ................. (very odd, indeed !!!)
So we have......
h(a) = a2 + 4 and "plugging" this result back into h(x), we have
h(a2 + 4) = (a2 + 4)2 + 4 = a4 + 8a2 + 20
And that's (h º h)(a) ...... (If that was the original intent !! )