+0  
 
0
375
6
avatar+405 

In stage one, there is 1 block. In stage 2, there are 4 blocks. In stage 3, there are 7 blocks.

                                                                                            ()

                                              ()                                           ()

   ()                                     () () ()                                 () () () () ()                             () = Block   s = Stage  n = Blocks

Stage 1                             Stage 2                                    Stage 3

 

Find a equation other than 3s + 1 = n

Complex  Dec 23, 2015

Best Answer 

 #4
avatar+90988 
+10

Hi Complex,

I plotted the 3 points and decided that a cubic could go through them if there was a horizontal point of inflection at (2,4)

so the graph goes though (1,1). and (3,7) and (2,4)

also     y'(2)=0   and y''(2)=0

so I started with

 

\(y=ax^3+bx^2+cx+d\\ y'=3ax^2+2bx+c\\ y''=6ax+2b \)

 

 

 

\(0=6a(2) + 2b\\ 0=12a+2b\\ 0=6a+b\\ b=-6a\\~\\ 0=3a(2^2)+2b(2)+c\\ 0=12a+4b+c\\ 0=12a+4(-6a)+c\\ 0=12a-24a+c\\ 0=-12a+c\\ c=12a\\~\\ y=ax^3+bx^2+cx+d\\ y=ax^3-6ax^2+12ax+d\\\)
 

\(y=ax^3-6ax^2+12ax+d\\ though (1,1)\\ 1=a-6a+12a+d\\ 1=7a+d\\ d=1-7a\\ y=ax^3-6ax^2+12ax+1-7a\\~\\ \)
\(through (2,4)\\ 4=a*2^3-6a*2^2+12a*2+1-7a\\ 4=8a-24a+24a+1-7a\\ 4=a+1\\ a=3\)

 

\(y=ax^3-6ax^2+12ax+1-7a\\ y=3x^3-18x^2+36x+1-21\\ y=3x^3-18x^2+36x-20\\\)

OR using your letters

 

\(\boxed{n=3s^3-18s^2+36s-20}\)

 

 

Melody  Dec 24, 2015
Sort: 

6+0 Answers

 #1
avatar
0

IDFGI

Guest Dec 23, 2015
 #2
avatar+78577 
+10

1  4  7  10  13

 

How about this pattern ????

 

1^2  - 0^2 + 0   =  1 + 0   = 1

2^2 - 1^2 + 1   =  3 + 1   = 4

3^2 - 2^2 + 2 =  5 + 2  = 7

4^2 - 3^2 + 3 = 7 + 3  = 10

5^2 - 4^2 + 4 = 9 + 4  = 13

6^2 - 5^2 + 5  =  11 + 5  = 16

 

=

 

[ (n)^2 - (n-1)^2] + (n - 1)  =  3n - 2

 

 

cool cool cool

CPhill  Dec 23, 2015
 #3
avatar+90988 
0

Chris, I do not think that yours is a new formula, it is just a mor complicated way of writing exactly the same formula. indecision

Melody  Dec 24, 2015
 #4
avatar+90988 
+10
Best Answer

Hi Complex,

I plotted the 3 points and decided that a cubic could go through them if there was a horizontal point of inflection at (2,4)

so the graph goes though (1,1). and (3,7) and (2,4)

also     y'(2)=0   and y''(2)=0

so I started with

 

\(y=ax^3+bx^2+cx+d\\ y'=3ax^2+2bx+c\\ y''=6ax+2b \)

 

 

 

\(0=6a(2) + 2b\\ 0=12a+2b\\ 0=6a+b\\ b=-6a\\~\\ 0=3a(2^2)+2b(2)+c\\ 0=12a+4b+c\\ 0=12a+4(-6a)+c\\ 0=12a-24a+c\\ 0=-12a+c\\ c=12a\\~\\ y=ax^3+bx^2+cx+d\\ y=ax^3-6ax^2+12ax+d\\\)
 

\(y=ax^3-6ax^2+12ax+d\\ though (1,1)\\ 1=a-6a+12a+d\\ 1=7a+d\\ d=1-7a\\ y=ax^3-6ax^2+12ax+1-7a\\~\\ \)
\(through (2,4)\\ 4=a*2^3-6a*2^2+12a*2+1-7a\\ 4=8a-24a+24a+1-7a\\ 4=a+1\\ a=3\)

 

\(y=ax^3-6ax^2+12ax+1-7a\\ y=3x^3-18x^2+36x+1-21\\ y=3x^3-18x^2+36x-20\\\)

OR using your letters

 

\(\boxed{n=3s^3-18s^2+36s-20}\)

 

 

Melody  Dec 24, 2015
 #5
avatar+78577 
+5

Mmmmmm.....the confusion over "formulas"  arises from the initial value of "s"

 

Actually, Complex"......if s = the stage number, then your formula  of 3s + 1  is incorrect, because at stage 1, s = 1 and we should have 4  blocks instead of just 1

 

I made a slight mistake in my formula  by using n instead of s  .......

 

I should have been....

 

3s - 2  = n,      assuming we can set s = 1   at the start

 

But....as to Melody's  assertion that it's the "same" formula re-written, we can see that it's not true because if it were, then

 

3s + 1  =  3s - 2   which implies that

 

1 = -2      !!!!

 

Melody's  "formula"  calculates the first three terms correctly......the 4th term would be 28 and the 5th term would be 85

 

If the intent of the sequence is to have a difference of 3 blocks at every stage, then her formula would not be correct.......if something else was intended, her formula might be correct and mine might be incorrect....

 

Who knows???

 

 

 

cool cool cool

CPhill  Dec 24, 2015
edited by CPhill  Dec 24, 2015
 #6
avatar+90988 
+5

Hi Chris and Complex.

 

I did not check the first formula I just assumed it was correct.

Since the first one was a linear, and Chris's was linear, and if they were both correct they would HAVE to be equivalent.

So I assumed Chris's was the same as the one given. (I did not actually compare them)

 

Three points defines a line so all linear representions have to be equivalent. ://

Melody  Dec 25, 2015

15 Online Users

We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.  See details