+0  
 
0
411
1
avatar

See: http://web2.0calc.com/questions/looking-for-transitory-steps-in-proof

 

I am curious about the case where x  <  -1  and x  >  1. Obviously this is a contradiction, but what does it mean? How can this contradiction be resolved? Or does it not need to be resolved, and it suffices to only have one half of the method provide a relevant answer?

 Sep 17, 2016
 #1
avatar+129840 
0

See my explanation under the original post....

 

 

 

 

cool cool cool

 Sep 17, 2016

2 Online Users

avatar