Trisect each side of an equilateral triangle of side length 2 and construct an equilateral triangle on the center third of each side. Omit the side of each new triangle that was once a part of the original triangle. Repeat the trisection, construction, and omission steps on each segment formed above, creating the figure below. When this process is repeated indefinitely, a new figure is approached. The square of the area of this new figure can be written as
where p and q are relatively prime positive integers. Find p + q. ps. the figure is a koch flake. pretty sure the answer is 223, but i some conformation. thank you :)
I think it's just a glitch but the problem is missing some values.
We need to know that the area of the square can be written as for p and q to solve this problem.
I think the latex didn't go through.
Can you please just fix the part for the equation?
I'll try to solve it then!
Thanks! ::)
Trisect each side of an equilateral triangle of side length 2 and construct an equilateral triangle on the center third of each side. Omit the side of each new triangle that was once a part of the original triangle. Repeat the trisection, construction, and omission steps on each segment formed above, creating the figure below. When this process is repeated indefinitely, a new figure is approached. The square of the area of this new figure can be written as p/q
where p and q are relatively prime positive integers. Find p + q. ps. the figure is a koch flake. pretty sure the answer is 223, but i some conformation. thank you :)
this is the edited version. thank u :)
This is a tough questipn! It takes some thought to solve! Good one!
Now, let's note something really important first.
The area of the koch flake can be written in the form
where a_0 was the original area and n was the iteration number.
The limit of the area in terms of sidelength s is
Thus, plugging in 2, we have
\(\frac{8\sqrt3}{5}\)
Now, we square it and see what we get. We have
\(\frac{64(3)}{25} = \frac{192}{25}\)
So \(p=192; q=25\)
Thus, \(p+q = 25+192 = 217\)
Hmmm, I'm not sure if I'm correct. Can you explain your thought process. I think I misunderstood my own logic...
I am pretty sure I'm wrong...ummm, is there a way you can check?
Thanks! :)
~NTS