Hi 315
c)
Consider
lim x tends to infinity of (some little positive number divided by x)
=a little positive number divided by a huge number
the limit will be 0.
like
9/1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
is a very tiny number and the more digits you add to the end of it the smaller and closer to zero it becomes.
Does that make sense?
d) lim x→3 [1/(x-3) - 9/(x2 - 9)] Notice that this simplifies to
lim x→3 [(x - 6)/(x2 - 9)]
Note that when
x → 3- .... [x - 6)/(x2 - 9)] → ∞ and when x → 3+ [x - 6)/(x2 - 9)] → - ∞
Thus .......lim x→3 [x - 6)/(x2 - 9)] = d.n.e.
e) lim x →∞ [(3 - cosx)/ (x2 + 10)] .......note that we can write this as
lim x →∞ [(3 / (x2 + 10)] - lim x →∞ [( cosx)/ (x2 + 10)]
The first is easy.... it just evaluates to 0
For the second, note that
-1 ≤ cosx ≤ 1 and dividing everything by x2 + 10, we have
[-1/x2 + 10] ≤ [cosx/x2 + 10] ≤ [1/x2 + 10]
Note that, as the two outside functions appproach infinity, they both approach 0. So, the middle function is "Squeezed" and it approaches 0, as well.
Therefore...... lim x →∞ [(3 - cosx)/ (x2 + 10)] = 0
f) lim x→∞ e [(x+ 1)/(2x^2 + 1)]
This one is easy....note that.... lim x→∞ [(x+ 1)/(2x^2 + 1)] = 0
So ....lim x→∞ e [(x+ 1)/(2x^2 + 1)] = lim x→∞ e0 = 1
I'm not great at limits......but I think these might be correct.....
okay.
I am really bad at limits. I'll state that up front.
d) I agree that d is undefined thaough I do not know what d.n.e stands for.
f) I get the same as Chris too.
$$\displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\;\;\frac{x+1}{2x^2+1}\\\\
=\displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\;\;\frac{1}{4x+1}\\\\
=0\\\\\\
=\displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\;\;e^0\\\\
=1$$
e) I'll admit to learning this one straight from CPhill. Thanks Chris
$$\displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\;\frac{3-cosx}{x^2+10}}\\\\
=\displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\;\frac{3}{x^2+10}}\;\;-\;\;\displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\;\frac{cosx}{x^2+10}}\\\\
=\;0\;-\;\;\displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\;\frac{cosx}{x^2+10}}\\\\
=\;-\;\;\displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\;\frac{cosx}{x^2+10}}\\\\
$Now $-1\le cosx\le 1\\\\
$So $\\\\
\displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\;\frac{-1}{x^2+10}\;\;\le \displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\;\frac{cosx}{x^2+10}\;\le\displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\;\frac{1}{x^2+10}\\\\
0\;\;\le \displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\;\frac{cosx}{x^2+10}\;\le\;0\\\\
$therefore$\\\\
\displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\;\frac{cosx}{x^2+10}\;=\;0\\\\$$
$$\\$therefore$\\\\
\displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\;\frac{3-cosx}{x^2+10}}=0-0=0\\\\$$
Thank you for showing me that Chris (This answer is exactly the same as Chris's)
More questions - 315 you can do these so perhaps you can tell me how please.
Otherwise maybe Chris or Alan would be able to assist please.
b) I think I can do this one
If it approaches from above then the limit will be 1
Ig it approaches from below then the limit will be -1
therefore the limit is undefined.
I just worked out a. you have to multiply top and bottom by the conjugate of the top and then it just falls out.
But what about c?
Melody, I only know how to do (a) using L'Hospital's
Taking the derivative of the top and the bottom =
(1/2)(2)/√(2x + 4) = 1/√(2x + 4)
So
lim x → 0 1/√(2x + 4) = 1/2
For (c)....note that -1 ≤ sin x^2 ≤ 1 ....and I believe we can do this one like (e) using the Squeeze Theorem
Thanks for that one, Alan.....
Is the fact that we were taking the limit around 0 is what allowed us to use that Maclaurin expansion???? [I think that's what I remember from Cal 2 !!!!]
I repeat!
I just worked out a. you have to multiply top and bottom by the conjugate of the top and then it just falls out.
It is quite simple this way. :)
$$\displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow 0} \frac{\sqrt{2x+4}-2}{x}\\\\
=\displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow 0} \frac{\sqrt{2x+4}-2}{x}\times \frac{\sqrt{2x+4}+2}{\sqrt{2x+4}+2}\\\\
=\displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow 0} \frac{(2x+4)-4}{x(\sqrt{2x+4}+2)}\\\\
=\displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow 0} \frac{2}{(\sqrt{2x+4}+2)}\\\\
=\frac{2}{(\sqrt{2*0+4}+2)}\\\\
=\frac{2}{4}\\\\
=\frac{1}{2}$$
Thank you Chris,
I haven't finished with this question yet but I have put it in the Sticky Thread "Great answers to Learn from" :)
c)
$$\\\displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty}\;\;\frac{sin(x^2)+10}{x^2+10}\\\\
Now\\
-1\le sin(x^2)\le 1\\
9\le sin(x^2)+10\le 11\\
$Therefore the numerator is a positive number between 9 and 11$\\
$Therefore$\\
\\\displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty}\;\;\frac{sin(x^2)+10}{x^2+10}=0$$
Hi 315
c)
Consider
lim x tends to infinity of (some little positive number divided by x)
=a little positive number divided by a huge number
the limit will be 0.
like
9/1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
is a very tiny number and the more digits you add to the end of it the smaller and closer to zero it becomes.
Does that make sense?
Your answer for e is good 315.
My only criticism (and it may be just a person dislike) is this
If -3<x<4
then technically
3>-x>-4
this is true but I don't like the presentation. I think the little number should go first and that it should be rearranged and presented as
-4<-x<3
Maybe this is just a personal bias, another mathermatician might like to comment.
Here's my approach to (c)
lim x → ∞ [sinx^2 + 10] /[x^ + 10]
Splitting this up, we have
lim x → ∞ [sinx^2 ] / [x^ + 10] + lim x → ∞ [ 10] / [x^ + 10]
Notice that the second thing just evaluates to 0
For the first...we can do the Squeeze Theorem "thing" again
-1 ≤ sin x^2 ≤ 1
And dividing each thing by x^2 + 10, we have
-1 / x^2 + 10 ≤ sin x^2 / x^2 + 10 ≤ 1 / X^2 + 10
And because the two "outside" functions approach 0 as x approaches infinity, then the middle one is "squeezed" to this limit, too.
Thus
lim x → ∞ [sinx^2 ] / [x^ + 10] + lim x → ∞ [ 10] / [x^ + 10] =
0 + 0 = 0 !!!!
Because
$$\\sin\;x^2+10\\
means \\(sin(x^2))+10\\
$If you want the sine of $ (x^2+10)\\
$then it should be written as $
sin(x^2+10)$$
Note xvxvxv.......here's the graph of sinx2 / x2 .........https://www.desmos.com/calculator/nflbtaael9
Note that the limit appears to be approaching 0 (not, 1) as x approaches infinity.....!!!!!
See my earlier answer on this one where I used the Squeeze Theorem......