M(t)=85e^(-t/719) describes the amount of a radioactive isotope as a function of time t [ years]. After how long the amount has dropped to 1/6 of the original ? The response can be written as t = a ln b where a and b are integers and a = 1
At time equal to 0 years(t=0),the original isotope has 85
when dropped to 1/6,the isotope has 85/6
substitute it into M(t) and we have
\(85/6=85*e^\left (-t/719 \right )\)
\(1/6=e^\left (-t/719 \right )\)
ln(1/6)=-t/719
-ln(6)=-t/719
ln6=t/719
t=719*ln6
t=ln(6^719)=1*ln(6^719)
6^719 about equal to infinity
NOTE: Anybody interested in understanding how radioactive substances decay with time, should read this page which very clearly explains it:
http://math.usask.ca/emr/examples/expdeceg.html
1/6 (85) = 85 e^(-t/719) this is of the form A = Ao e^kt where k= -.0013908
1/6 = e^(-t/719)
ln(1/6) = (-t/719)
-719 ln(1/6) = t = 1288.28 years
NO!. When you calculate k, you no longer use the half-life given, which is 719 years in this case. So that your equation should read: 85/6 =85 * e^(-0.000964 * t), which is equal to: 85/6 =85 * 2^(-t/719). If you now solve for t in both cases, you will get EXACTLY the same answer, which comes to:1,858.59 years.
But your answer does not satisfy the given equation for decay...
the question CLEARLY states the amount of isotope is given by 85e^(-t/719) where t is in years.
The ORIGINAL amount is given by t= 0 85
85e^((-1858.59)/719) = the amount at 1858.59 years = 6.4088 which is NOT 1/6 of 85 = 14.166
ALAN WILL EXPLAIN IT TO YOU TOMORROW, HOPEFULLY. THE EQUATION, AS GIVEN, IS THE PROBLEM. THAT IS WHY I MODIFIED IT. IF YOU SUBSTITUTE 1/2 FOR e, THEN YOU WILL GET THE RIGHT ANSWER: SOLVE FOR t: 85/6=85 * 1/2^(t/719), WHERE t=ELAPSED NUMBER OF YEARS, 719=HALF-LIFE OF THE RADIOACTIVE SUBSTANCE. THAT IS THE END OF THIS MATTER FOR ME!.
See: http://web2.0calc.com/questions/m-t-85e-t-29-describes-the-amount-of-a-radioactive-isotope-as-a-function-of-time-t-years-after-how-long-the-amount-has-dropped-to-1-10-of#r9
Nowhere does the original question call 719 the half-life.
The structure of the equation implies that 1/719 is the decay constant, so the half-life would be ln(2)/(1/719) or just 719*ln(2).
Alan: Is the constant of decay ALWAYS a rational number in these examples given by this questioner?: 1/29, 1/719, 1/409.........etc.???!!!. I thought when you obtain the constant of decay by taking the natural log of 2 or 1/2 and multiplying it or dividing it by half-life, you automatically get an irrational constant of decay. No?.
If the half life is specified then the decay constant will be (mathematically) irrational because of the ln(2). However, there is no compulsion to specify the half-life; one may specify the decay constant instead.
For real-world situations, both the half-life and the decay constant will only be approximate anyway (because based on experimental measurement with attendant inaccuracies).
I guess the examples provided by the questioner here are artificial examples dreamt up by a teacher.