+0  
 
0
1933
1
avatar

http://media.education2020.com/evresources/2072396_7227e64a-7718-4d4a-a5fe-9c9eed707e1d.png Paul observes that / and concludes that / and / must be tangent to the circle. What is wrong with Paul's reasoning? A. Nothing; Paul is correct. B. The radius of the circle is unknown, so / and / can't be tangent to the circle. C. There is no indication that / and / are perpendicular to the radii at the points of intersection with the circle. D. The lengths of / and / aren't given, so Paul can't conclude they are congruent

 Jul 13, 2016
 #1
avatar+118659 
0

C

Well they look like tangents but if that is not known for sure then I guess the answer is C

 Jul 13, 2016

0 Online Users