+0

# Sum of digits.....

0
142
10

How far up the number line would you have to go in order for the sum of all individual digits would equal 1,000,000? Example:11 would be 1+1=2, 27 would be 2+7=9, 113 would be 1+1+3=5.....and so on. Thanks for help.

Jul 1, 2018

#1
0

well 9 being the highest number to yeild the best results, i would think you would divide,

1000000/9 this would be about 111111, so if you added 111,111 9's that would be 999,999.

then you need a 1 to make it a 1,000,000. put that in front to make it the smallest number possible.

so the answer would be 1999999999... basically 111,111 9's

Jul 1, 2018
#2
0

To do this accurately, you would need to write a short computer code to count all the digits and then sum them all up. I just happened to have written such a code a while ago for another question of this nature:

It turns out that you have to add up all the individual digits of all the numbers from 1 to 49,999 and then would get exactly a total of 1,000,000 as follows:

(18889, 30000, 30000, 30000, 30000, 20000, 20000, 20000, 20000, 20000)=238,889.

0s          1s        2s         3s        4s          5s        6s       7s         8s         9s

Then you have =[18,889 x 0 + 30,000 x 1 + 30,000 x 2 + 30,000 x 3 + 30,000 x 4 +20,000 x 5 + 20,000 x 6 + 20,000 x 7 + 20,0000 x 8 + 20,000 x 9] =1,000,000 Exactly!!!

Jul 1, 2018
edited by Guest  Jul 1, 2018
edited by Guest  Jul 1, 2018
#3
0

I wrote a program to sum the sizes of my di ck, while looking at old penthouse mags. After a 2 seconds, it says Out of memory. Number too large error.

Jul 1, 2018
#4
0

I don't think you have a big di...ck-wishful thinking?- but possibly a big mouth to swallow one!!. Try writing a program for that and publish it!!.

Guest Jul 1, 2018
#5
0

I could write one, but I did another test using your di ck size and it says Out of memory. Number too small error. This proves my program works!!

I used wolfram alpha for mine and it says computational time exceeded.

Guest Jul 1, 2018
#6
0

You seen my di....k? O my, I wonder who could it be??!! I think you are more likely to have a "h...le in the middle" than a di.........k!!. I think your first name begins with "G........ape"!!.

Guest Jul 1, 2018
#7
0

No. I couldn’t see your di ck, it’s too small! Your name begins with “A” A S S HOLE!

Guest Jul 1, 2018
#8
0

You are itching for a "Big D.....ckk", you fff...........in' 2-bit 'ho'!!!. Take your meds!.

Jul 1, 2018
#9
0

One of my meds makes my di ck bigger. You should buy them wholesale, and then maybe you wouldn’t be a little di ck.   You might even be a big di ck, but you will always be a little A S S hole.

Guest Jul 1, 2018
#10
0

Please do not post such things on web2.0calc! We do not tolerate such conversations. Thank you!

Jul 1, 2018