We use cookies to personalise content and advertisements and to analyse access to our website. Furthermore, our partners for online advertising receive pseudonymised information about your use of our website. cookie policy and privacy policy.
 
+0  
 
0
43
3
avatar

whats 1+1?

off-topic
 Nov 25, 2019
 #1
avatar
+2

 

whats 1+1?       

 

To solve this, we must count on our fingers.

 

Hold up a closed hand.

Say "one..."         and raise your index (first) finger.  

Say "plus one..."  and raise your middle (second) finger.

 

Examine your hand which has the first two fingers raised.

 

In a voice full of joyous discovery, shout "Bunny!"    

.

 Nov 26, 2019
 #2
avatar+435 
+1

I am hoping if you have the knowledge to type words on a computer you know that 1+1=2 

but here is an interesting proof I found for this.

 

The proof starts from the Peano Postulates, which define the natural numbers N. N is the smallest set satisfying these postulates: P1. 1 is in N. P2. If x is in N, then its "successor" x' is in N. P3. There is no x such that x' = 1. P4. If x isn't 1, then there is a y in N such that y' = x. P5. If S is a subset of N, 1 is in S, and the implication (x in S => x' in S) holds, then S = N. Then you have to define addition recursively: Def: Let a and b be in N. If b = 1, then define a + b = a' (using P1 and P2). If b isn't 1, then let c' = b, with c in N (using P4), and define a + b = (a + c)'. Then you have to define 2: Def: 2 = 1' 2 is in N by P1, P2, and the definition of 2. Theorem: 1 + 1 = 2 Proof: Use the first part of the definition of + with a = b = 1. Then 1 + 1 = 1' = 2 Q.E.D. Note: There is an alternate formulation of the Peano Postulates which replaces 1 with 0 in P1, P3, P4, and P5. Then you have to change the definition of addition to this: Def: Let a and b be in N. If b = 0, then define a + b = a. If b isn't 0, then let c' = b, with c in N, and define a + b = (a + c)'. You also have to define 1 = 0', and 2 = 1'. Then the proof of the Theorem above is a little different: Proof: Use the second part of the definition of + first: 1 + 1 = (1 + 0)' Now use the first part of the definition of + on the sum in parentheses: 1 + 1 = (1)' = 1' = 2 Q.E.D.

 Nov 26, 2019
 #3
avatar
0

 

I believed that 1+1=2 until I read this.  Now, I'm not so certain.  SMH.

?

Guest Nov 26, 2019

39 Online Users

avatar
avatar