+118724 Yes, okay, I will consider it. 
I only changed to my new one because CPhill called me a dinosaur. (That is what Zegroes used to call me)
How rude. LOL
I am only kidding, CPhill and I (and Zegroes) are great mates. (That is Australian slang for very good friends)
They would/could never offend me :))
+118724 There you go, I changed to a musical kangaroo but he is a bit blurry and the frame has been cut off a bit. 
How do you like that one?
I shall ponder this very important matter more.
(Or was it really the Rainbow Lorikeet that you liked. I have them in my garden )
+1038 Melody you should continue to use your photo from your college days. The juxtaposing contrast to CPhill’s photo is more than symbolic.
Here, a poll dancer who pays her way through college, and makes a higher wage than she will make after obtaining a situation with a degree. (This is just as well, because here, time and gravity tend to change ones employment options very quickly).
The other works for a freight train transport company. Who places her at strategic locations, in case of emergency, to deflect runaway trains. The trains will always take the dirt road, when a medusa is on the tracks – this is a known fact of science though the reason for is not fully understood.
Indeed, the stereotype of women who major in sciences or maths looking more like CPhill’s avatar photo than yours is a well established stereotype, and all but written in the very stone created by this medusa effect.
The outcomes for students who study under the tutelage of teachers of these extremes generally follow these two scenarios:
Group one diligently studies to get her number.
Group two desperately studies in the desire to create a metaphase force shield to protect themselves and society from the monolithic massacre that often follows such creatures.
One helps to procreate, the other helps to protect the procreation.
Just a thought for your consideration on the good the bad and the ugly.
