+0  
 
0
14947
8
avatar+1904 

What is the inverse of y=2x + 3?  Please  show all steps.

 May 15, 2015

Best Answer 

 #1
avatar+33615 
+10

First get x on its own:

 

Subtract 3 from each side

y - 3 = 2x

 

Divide through by 2

y/2 - 3/2 = x

or x = y/2 - 3/2

 

Now simply switch labels: x↔y

y = x/2 - 3/2

.

 May 15, 2015
 #1
avatar+33615 
+10
Best Answer

First get x on its own:

 

Subtract 3 from each side

y - 3 = 2x

 

Divide through by 2

y/2 - 3/2 = x

or x = y/2 - 3/2

 

Now simply switch labels: x↔y

y = x/2 - 3/2

.

Alan May 15, 2015
 #2
avatar+1904 
+5

y=2x+3

 

First switch x and y around to get x=2y+3

 

Now solve for y

 

x-3=2y

 

(x-3)/2=y or y=(x-3)/2

 May 15, 2015
 #3
avatar+33615 
+5

If you look carefully gibsonj338 you will see that the two results are the same - they are just expressed slightly differently.

.

 May 15, 2015
 #4
avatar+118609 
+5

Please correct me if I am wrong Alan but

I think that you have always made a big point of telling me that I am not allowed to swap the x and y over and rearrange afterwards.

I have never understood why but i think it is because you have to be very careful that the inverse is still a function.  

That is, in the original function every x value must map to a unique y value (vertical line test)

and if you are going to get an inverse function then every original y value must map to a unique original x value.

So if you take an inverse of a function you may have to limit the domain of the new inverse function or else it may not be a function at all.

Most times I do not think that there is any problem with doing it this way but you have to be careful.

Did I get this it right Alan ?

 May 15, 2015
 #5
avatar+33615 
+5

Yes, but in this case of course it is a simple linear function defined over all the real numbers for both x and y, so it works out ok either way.

.

 May 15, 2015
 #6
avatar+118609 
0

Thanks Alan,

I thought it would work anyway so long as I am careful about the restrictions.

It still confuses me.    I don't understand why you say I can't do it.   

 May 15, 2015
 #7
avatar+33615 
+5

Consider the function y = x2 

This doesn't have an inverse (in the real number domain) because there isn't a unique value of x for a given y, but by writing x = y2 before doing anything else you imply there is (to qualify as a function an expression must map an input to a unique output).

 

However, as you say, the important thing is being careful about the restrictions.  As long as you keep this in mind I will not say you can't do it Melody!  

.

 May 15, 2015
 #8
avatar+118609 
0

Mmm Thanks Alan

I am just thinking here.

Your way

 

$$\\y=x^2\\
\pm\sqrt{y}=x\\
x=\pm\sqrt{y}\\
$No inverse even with domain restricitions because all x in the domain map to 2 y values$$

My usual way

$$\\y=x^2\\
x=y^2\\
y=\pm\sqrt{x}\\
$But this is not a function so there is no inverse.$$$

 

Ok  I can see that your way is a little tidier :)

 May 15, 2015

1 Online Users