+0  
 
0
1050
9
avatar

What would 2033333333.3333333333333333 be in scientific notation?

 Nov 8, 2014

Best Answer 

 #9
avatar+118613 
+5

Hi Mathematician :)

You are right - I put an 8 where a 9 should have been.  :)

Let's think about your dilema.

----------------------------------

634.182 = 6 hundreds + 3 tens + 4 units + 1 tenth + 8 hundredths + 2 thousandths

we know that

634.182= 6.34182 * 102

so

6.34182 * 102  = 6 hundreds + 3 tens + 4 units + 1 tenth + 8 hundredths + 2 thousandths

SEE the 4 is not hundredths it is units!

 

When you round off scientific notation you must talk about accuracy to so many significant figures.

Think about it - maybe then it will make sense.  

 

You do not ever need to be sorry for asking questions.  That is what we are here for.   

 Nov 9, 2014
 #1
avatar+1090 
+5

Since 2 is the largest value, you move the decimal point 9 places to the left and have:

2.0333333333333333333333333 * 10^9

Then you round it to the nearest hundreths place and it becomes: 2.03 * 10^9.

 Nov 8, 2014
 #2
avatar+118613 
+5

Good answer Mathematician but you have not rounded it to the nearest hundredth!

You have rounded it to 3 significant figures  

 Nov 8, 2014
 #3
avatar+1090 
0

The whole of my operations was rounding it to three significant figures. In explaining that particular step though, it was clearer to say "hundreths place" than "three significant figues". I will add "three significant figures" to the end of my explanations if you think that will be a better answer for the question asker.

 Nov 8, 2014
 #4
avatar+128707 
+5

2033333333.3333333333333333  in scientific notation???

I think it would be:   " 2 much "

 

 Nov 8, 2014
 #5
avatar+118613 
+5

You miss my point :))

It is not to the hundredth place

This is you number

2.0333333333333333333333333*10^9

I shall write it correct to the hundredth place for you

2033333333.33

0r

2.03333333333*10^9

Now that is written correct to the nearest hundredth !!!    :)))

 Nov 8, 2014
 #6
avatar+1090 
0

Are you trying to point out my "it" is not specific enough to explain what I am rounding to the hundreths place? I was not thinking of 2.0333333333333333333333333 * 10^9 as a value, I was explaining it as two seperate values.

I rounded the number 2.0333333333333333333333333 to the nearest hundreth: 2.03.

 

If I you explain my error in thinking more clearly or in more depth, that would be helpful.

2033333333.3333333333333333#sthash.yKIihqOQ.dpuf
2033333333.3333333333333333#sthash.yKIihqOQ.dpuf
2.0333333333333333333333333*10^9#sthash.yKIihqOQ.dpuf
2.0333333333333333333333333*10^9#sthash.yKIihqOQ.dpuf
2.0333333333333333333333333*10^9#sthash.yKIihqOQ.dpuf
 Nov 8, 2014
 #7
avatar+118613 
+5

Say you want to round 345.9824 to the neares hundredth.

The answer is 345.88

now 345.9824=3.459824*10^2

Using your logic then to round this to the nearest hundreth the answer would be

3.45*10^2

BUT

3.45*10^2 is not equal to 345.88 so they cannot both be rounded to the nearest hundredth.

That is simply not correct!

 Nov 8, 2014
 #8
avatar+1090 
+5

I still do not understand where my thinking is in error. I just have a different way of finding the solution and perhaps different ideas of the meanings of mathematical terminology. Also 345.9824 to the nearest hundredth is 345.98 not 345.88.

 

I am quite sorry that I am not understanding.

 Nov 9, 2014
 #9
avatar+118613 
+5
Best Answer

Hi Mathematician :)

You are right - I put an 8 where a 9 should have been.  :)

Let's think about your dilema.

----------------------------------

634.182 = 6 hundreds + 3 tens + 4 units + 1 tenth + 8 hundredths + 2 thousandths

we know that

634.182= 6.34182 * 102

so

6.34182 * 102  = 6 hundreds + 3 tens + 4 units + 1 tenth + 8 hundredths + 2 thousandths

SEE the 4 is not hundredths it is units!

 

When you round off scientific notation you must talk about accuracy to so many significant figures.

Think about it - maybe then it will make sense.  

 

You do not ever need to be sorry for asking questions.  That is what we are here for.   

Melody Nov 9, 2014

2 Online Users

avatar