Can someone please help me with this? I just can't seem to get the right answer ugh
The function shown is in the form y = (x - h)2. Determine the value of h.
The equation graphed in the picture is not linear (because the graph is not a straight line). It is a quadratic, however, because it forms a parabola. I will use the quadratic in "vertex" form.
f(x)=a(x−h)2+k where (h,k) is the vertex.
However, we do not know what the value of a is. Therefore, I will resort to the "standard" quadratic form:
f(x)=ax2+bx+c
Before we can identify the equation that contains this parabola, let's see if we can determine the y-intercept. It would appear as if it is located at (0,4). Let's plug that in.
f(x)=ax2+bx+c | Plug this in when x=0. |
f(0)=a(0)2=b∗0+c | Of course, the 0's make simplification much easier. |
f(0)=c | Now, we know what f(0) equals because we know the corresponding y-coordinate when x=0. It happens to be 4. |
4=c | |
Now, let's use another point. This time, I will use the vertex, which appears to be located at (2,0). Let's do the exact same process.
f(x)=ax2+bx+c | Replace every instance of x with 2, in this case, as that is the x-coordinate we want. |
f(2)=a(2)2+b∗2+c | Let's simplify the right hand side. |
f(2)=4a+2b+c | Of course, we know that f(2)=0. |
0=4a+2b+c | |
We need 1 more point. For a quadratic, you always need 3 points to determine its equation. Because quadratic equations have symmetry along its axis of symmetry, we know that (4,4) is also a point on the parabola. Let's plug that in, and we will utilize the exact same process.
f(4)=a(4)2+b∗4+c | Yet again, simplify the right hand side. |
f(4)=16a+4b+c | We know that f(4)=4, so plug that in. |
4=16a+4b+c | |
Great! Let's look at these equations side-by-side:
{ 4=c
{ 0=4a+2b+c
{ 4=16a+4b+c
Of course, if 4=c, then we can make this look a tad nicer:
{ 0=4a+2b+4
{ 4=16a+4b+4
Let's make it nicer again! To make it easier, the first equation has a GCF of 2, and the second equation has a GCF of 4. Simplifying this will make the numbers in our system of equations smaller and easier to work with.
{ 0=2a+b+2
{ 1=4a+b+1
Now, let's solve this system of equations! I will use the substitution method because it is easier to understand when I write. I'll use the first equation first. My goal here is to isolate a variable. Since b has a coefficient of 1 already, I think I will isolate that variable.
0=2a+b+2 | Subtract b on both sides. |
−b=2a+2 | Divide by -1 on both sides to isolate b. |
b=−2a−2 | |
Plug this into b for equation 2:
1=4a+b+1 | Since b=−2a−2 according to our previous equation, plug that in. |
1=4a+(−2a−2)+1 | Simplify the right hand side of the equation. The parentheses aren't actually necessary, but it might make it clearer where the substitution is taking place. |
1=2a−1 | Add 1 to both sides. |
2=2a | Divide by 2 on both sides to isolate a. |
a=1 | |
Great! We know that a=1. We actually need not solve for b, in this case, as we know what the vertex is already, and we can use vertex form. As a recap, "vertex" form is the following:
f(x)=a(x−h)2+k where (h,k) is the vertex
Well, a=1, and the vertex is (2,0). Plug that in.
f(x)=1(x−2)2+0
This can be simplified.
f(x)=(x−2)2
This means that a=1, h=2, and k=0. I hope this helps!
y=(x+h)2
y=2(x+h)
y=2x+2h
First find a point on the graph and replace x and y for the point. The point I will use is the point (2,0)
y=2x+2h
0=2(2)+2h
Next solve for h.
0=2(2)+2h
0=4+2h
0−4=4+2h−4
−4=4+2h−4
−4=2h−0
−4=2h
−42=2h2
−42=2h2
−21=2h2
−2=2h2
−2=1h1
−2=1h
−2=h
h=−2
The answer is h=−2. The equation is y=2(x+(−2)) or y=2(x−2) or y=2x−4
oh wow! No wonder I could not figure out what I was doing :/ One question though, my answer choices are 1, -1, 2 and -1/2
Could it be positive 2 instead of -2?
The equation graphed in the picture is not linear (because the graph is not a straight line). It is a quadratic, however, because it forms a parabola. I will use the quadratic in "vertex" form.
f(x)=a(x−h)2+k where (h,k) is the vertex.
However, we do not know what the value of a is. Therefore, I will resort to the "standard" quadratic form:
f(x)=ax2+bx+c
Before we can identify the equation that contains this parabola, let's see if we can determine the y-intercept. It would appear as if it is located at (0,4). Let's plug that in.
f(x)=ax2+bx+c | Plug this in when x=0. |
f(0)=a(0)2=b∗0+c | Of course, the 0's make simplification much easier. |
f(0)=c | Now, we know what f(0) equals because we know the corresponding y-coordinate when x=0. It happens to be 4. |
4=c | |
Now, let's use another point. This time, I will use the vertex, which appears to be located at (2,0). Let's do the exact same process.
f(x)=ax2+bx+c | Replace every instance of x with 2, in this case, as that is the x-coordinate we want. |
f(2)=a(2)2+b∗2+c | Let's simplify the right hand side. |
f(2)=4a+2b+c | Of course, we know that f(2)=0. |
0=4a+2b+c | |
We need 1 more point. For a quadratic, you always need 3 points to determine its equation. Because quadratic equations have symmetry along its axis of symmetry, we know that (4,4) is also a point on the parabola. Let's plug that in, and we will utilize the exact same process.
f(4)=a(4)2+b∗4+c | Yet again, simplify the right hand side. |
f(4)=16a+4b+c | We know that f(4)=4, so plug that in. |
4=16a+4b+c | |
Great! Let's look at these equations side-by-side:
{ 4=c
{ 0=4a+2b+c
{ 4=16a+4b+c
Of course, if 4=c, then we can make this look a tad nicer:
{ 0=4a+2b+4
{ 4=16a+4b+4
Let's make it nicer again! To make it easier, the first equation has a GCF of 2, and the second equation has a GCF of 4. Simplifying this will make the numbers in our system of equations smaller and easier to work with.
{ 0=2a+b+2
{ 1=4a+b+1
Now, let's solve this system of equations! I will use the substitution method because it is easier to understand when I write. I'll use the first equation first. My goal here is to isolate a variable. Since b has a coefficient of 1 already, I think I will isolate that variable.
0=2a+b+2 | Subtract b on both sides. |
−b=2a+2 | Divide by -1 on both sides to isolate b. |
b=−2a−2 | |
Plug this into b for equation 2:
1=4a+b+1 | Since b=−2a−2 according to our previous equation, plug that in. |
1=4a+(−2a−2)+1 | Simplify the right hand side of the equation. The parentheses aren't actually necessary, but it might make it clearer where the substitution is taking place. |
1=2a−1 | Add 1 to both sides. |
2=2a | Divide by 2 on both sides to isolate a. |
a=1 | |
Great! We know that a=1. We actually need not solve for b, in this case, as we know what the vertex is already, and we can use vertex form. As a recap, "vertex" form is the following:
f(x)=a(x−h)2+k where (h,k) is the vertex
Well, a=1, and the vertex is (2,0). Plug that in.
f(x)=1(x−2)2+0
This can be simplified.
f(x)=(x−2)2
This means that a=1, h=2, and k=0. I hope this helps!